2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1740132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Office of the Chief Scientist and the Financing of Israel's High Tech Research & Development, 2000-2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, failing to control for the appropriate trends would imply that the effect of the policy reform indicator on the likelihood of a startup applying for a subsidy is upward biased. While in our regressions we control for sector-specific time trends, in Panels A and B of Table A2, we present the results from estimating equations (4) and (5) in separate subsamples of ICT and non-ICT startups. The reason is that the effects of the policy reform on non-ICT startups should be uncorrelated or less correlated with the bursting of the dot-com bubble.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, failing to control for the appropriate trends would imply that the effect of the policy reform indicator on the likelihood of a startup applying for a subsidy is upward biased. While in our regressions we control for sector-specific time trends, in Panels A and B of Table A2, we present the results from estimating equations (4) and (5) in separate subsamples of ICT and non-ICT startups. The reason is that the effects of the policy reform on non-ICT startups should be uncorrelated or less correlated with the bursting of the dot-com bubble.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…subsidized applicants and non-applicants (I vs. III); iii) non-subsidized applicants and non-applicants (II vs. III). This table reports the estimations of equations (4) and (5) for the likelihood that a startup applies for an R&D subsidy. In columns I and II, the results are for the entire sample of startups; in columns III and IV the results are for startups founded through 2006; in columns V and VI for startups founded through 2006, excluding applications filed after two years from a startup's inception; in columns VII and VIII for startups founded during 1997 through 2006, excluding applications filed after two years from a startup's inception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations