2003
DOI: 10.1177/1049731503013004007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ohio Substance Abuse and Mental Illness Coordinating Center of Excellence: Implementation Support for Evidence-Based Practice

Abstract: Mental health and chemical dependency providers, administrators, policy makers, and advocates across the country have become increasingly aware of the challenges related to the needs of dually disordered clients. Co-occurring 531

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach drew upon the MidAmerica Addiction Technology Transfer Strategy-Stages of the Implementation Process (Baehni, Harmon, & Stilen, 2006), Fixsen et al's (2005) stages of implementation and work by the Ohio Substance Abuse and Mental Illness CoOccurring Center of Excellence (Biegel et al, 2003;Ronis, 2004). It included a program change agent, bimonthly implementation coaching, intensive training on specific EBPs for COD, and fidelity visits by outside evaluators that supported the development of an implementation plan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach drew upon the MidAmerica Addiction Technology Transfer Strategy-Stages of the Implementation Process (Baehni, Harmon, & Stilen, 2006), Fixsen et al's (2005) stages of implementation and work by the Ohio Substance Abuse and Mental Illness CoOccurring Center of Excellence (Biegel et al, 2003;Ronis, 2004). It included a program change agent, bimonthly implementation coaching, intensive training on specific EBPs for COD, and fidelity visits by outside evaluators that supported the development of an implementation plan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for program location is limited, but a few studies suggest that urban programs are more likely than rural programs to implement EBPs or innovative technologies (Fendrick, Escarce, McLane, Shea, & Schwartz, 1994;Poulsen et al, 2001). Biegel et al (2003) noted that rural agencies implementing IDDT encountered difficulties, such as clinicians having significant non-COD caseloads (and thus having to split their focus on different types of clients), few housing resources, travel distances that limited outreach and engagement, and agency financial stress.…”
Section: Structural Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) have initiated strategic plans for dissemination. Additionally, many state-based initiatives have commenced programs to implement EBT programs (Biegel et al, 2003; Chorpita et al, 2002). Despite this move towards dissemination of EBTs, there remain major obstacles to the effectiveness of dissemination attempts.…”
Section: Stages Of Treatment Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activities pertaining to disseminating and facilitating the implementation of the IDDT treatment model typically draw from knowledge transfer principles and strategies. Examples of such activities include, but not limited to: audience segmentation (a social marketing construct) via the use of ‗tool kits' created for specific stakeholder subgroups ; standardized practice guidelines and fidelity measures (Drake et al, 2001); consultation and training (Drake et al, 2001); and the facilitation of stakeholder collaboration and consensus building toward maintaining maximal fidelity to the original innovation (Biegel et al, 2003) .…”
Section: "Implementation": a Linear Process Discrete From Creating Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regards to fidelity and organizational variations from the IDDT model that may occur, Biegel et al (2003) stated:…”
Section: "Implementation": a Linear Process Discrete From Creating Nementioning
confidence: 99%