1984
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(84)90317-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The one-gluon exchange effects to of baryon semileptonic decay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…09, given previously in the bag model [3,6], the ratio improves significantly after considering the correction from the CMM.…”
Section: Transition Matrix Elementssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…09, given previously in the bag model [3,6], the ratio improves significantly after considering the correction from the CMM.…”
Section: Transition Matrix Elementssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In astrophysics, under the framework of the bag model, the strange stars, neutron stars and quark cores are viewed as large bags containing countless quarks [5]. In spite of these great progresses, the bag model has little application in the particle decay system, mainly due to the center of mass motion (CMM) [6]. This study is devoted to introduce the homogeneous bag model to provide a consistent framework to deal with the CMM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shifts total angular-momentum between spin and orbital contributions and, therefore, also contributes to model calculations of the octet axial-charges [24]. We denote this contribution, which has been evaluated to be 0.0373 [24,30] in the MIT Bag (without centre of mass corrections), as G.…”
Section: Process Measurement Su(3) Combination Fit Value Mit + Ogementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fallacy of the additive quark models becomes apparent for the baryon magnetic moments where these quark models give the wrong inequality, i.e., for the measured magnetic moments |µ(Ξ − )| > |µ(Λ)| [2]. These "spin" problems of F and D and of the baryon magnetic moments are easily explained by invoking the same effective color magnetic spin-spin interaction that give the "bare" nucleon -"bare" ∆ mass splitting [16,17,18]. This effective interaction introduces dynamic spin-spin correlations in the baryon wave functions that not only resolves the F/D problem, F/D ≈ 0.57, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%