2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2019.105583
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The onset of oxidative weathering traced by uranium isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The understanding of sedimentary U isotope signatures is particular important, as they are frequently used to reconstruct the redox evolution of Earth’s oceans and atmosphere. However, ligands likely existed in the environment since the mid-Archean (e.g., by the degradation of organic materials and metabolites by microorganisms) , and may have mobilized small amounts of U, imposing the associated U isotope fractionation. In particular, in the Archean, the findings of our study may challenge the interpretation of variable δ 238 U, which are commonly interpreted as the onset of oxidative geochemical U cycling. ,, Heavy isotope signatures in Archean or early Proterozoic shales may be interpreted to be the product of partial U reduction during the deposition of the sediments. In such a model, it is assumed that U was mobilized during U weathering with little isotope effects and that the heavy shale signature, thus, indirectly indicated the onset of oxic weathering with quantitative U mobilization.…”
Section: Implications For the Use Of U Isotope Proxymentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The understanding of sedimentary U isotope signatures is particular important, as they are frequently used to reconstruct the redox evolution of Earth’s oceans and atmosphere. However, ligands likely existed in the environment since the mid-Archean (e.g., by the degradation of organic materials and metabolites by microorganisms) , and may have mobilized small amounts of U, imposing the associated U isotope fractionation. In particular, in the Archean, the findings of our study may challenge the interpretation of variable δ 238 U, which are commonly interpreted as the onset of oxidative geochemical U cycling. ,, Heavy isotope signatures in Archean or early Proterozoic shales may be interpreted to be the product of partial U reduction during the deposition of the sediments. In such a model, it is assumed that U was mobilized during U weathering with little isotope effects and that the heavy shale signature, thus, indirectly indicated the onset of oxic weathering with quantitative U mobilization.…”
Section: Implications For the Use Of U Isotope Proxymentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In particular, in the Archean, the findings of our study may challenge the interpretation of variable δ 238 U, which are commonly interpreted as the onset of oxidative geochemical U cycling. 79,82,83 Heavy isotope signatures in Archean or early Proterozoic shales may be interpreted to be the product of partial U reduction during the deposition of the sediments. In such a model, it is assumed that U was mobilized during U weathering with little isotope effects and that the heavy shale signature, thus, indirectly indicated the onset of oxic weathering with quantitative U mobilization.…”
Section: Implications For the Use Of U Isotope Proxymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Bone et al (2017), the role of adsorption could be critical in aqueous systems with low U concentrations, as adsorption could lower the dissolved U(IV) concentration below the level required for uraninite precipitation. Based on studies of U concentrations in Precambrian BIFs (Partin et al 2013b), shales (Partin et al 2013a), and carbonates (this study; Gilleaudeau et al 2019;Brüske et al 2020a), it is likely that the U concentrations in the Archean and Proterozoic oceans were factors of 10 to 100 lower than they are in today's oceans. In this context, the pathway for U removal into anoxic sediments could have been very different compared to the modern oceans, where both precipitation and adsorption are involved.…”
Section: Non-uniformitarian U Isotopic Fractionation During Depositiomentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In order to reconstruct the long-term redox evolution of the ocean, a large suite of marine carbonates ( Table 1) was assembled and the U concentrations and isotopic compositions of 95 carbonate samples spanning the Archean to Neoproterozoic were measured and combined with previously published data (Brennecka et al 2011;Dahl et al 2014Dahl et al , 2017Dahl et al , 2019Azmy et al 2015;Hood et al 2016;Lau et al 2016Lau et al , 2017Elrick et al 2017;Jost et al 2017;Song et al 2017;Bartlett et al 2018;Chen et al 2018aChen et al , 2018bClarkson et al 2018;Herrmann et al 2018;Phan et al 2018;White et al 2018;Zhang et al 2018aZhang et al , 2018bZhang et al , 2018cZhang et al , 2019aZhang et al , 2019bZhang et al , 2020aZhang et al , 2020cGilleaudeau et al 2019;Tostevin et al 2019;Brüske et al 2020a;Bura-Nakić et al 2020;Cheng et al 2020;Li et al 2020;del Rey et al 2020;Zhao et al 2020). The age and detailed description of the geological settings can be found in the references provided in Table 1 and in Supplementary Materials.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, progressively heavier Mo isotope compositions are found in sedimentary rocks formed between about 2.6 and 2.5 Ga and inferred as evidence of a progressive rise in atmospheric and oceanic O 2 levels (Wille et al, 2007;Kurzweil et al, 2015). Yet, in some of these same rocks, generally invariant C (Fischer et al, 2009) and U (Brüske et al, 2020) isotope compositions are inferred as evidence of little to no change to Earth's surface O 2 levels. To summarize, emerging evidence clearly identifies brief, single-million-year O 2 accumulation events on the eve of the GOE, but no clear consensus yet exists for the O 2 levels that persisted over much longer, tens-of-million-year timeframes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%