The Ecology and Management of Wetlands 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-9807-7_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ontario Wetland Evaluation System: Replicability and Bird Habitat Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it made sense to us, using avian resource-based guilds to develop habitat models and to evaluate the impacts of human settlement on waterbirds has not yet been tested fully in Ontario's wetlands or, indeed, in other wetlands in North America. We believe that the delineation of waterbirds into guilds based on foraging strategy provides a useful and relatively simple way to assess and monitor human-caused impacts on wetland species (see Glooschenko et al 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although it made sense to us, using avian resource-based guilds to develop habitat models and to evaluate the impacts of human settlement on waterbirds has not yet been tested fully in Ontario's wetlands or, indeed, in other wetlands in North America. We believe that the delineation of waterbirds into guilds based on foraging strategy provides a useful and relatively simple way to assess and monitor human-caused impacts on wetland species (see Glooschenko et al 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bird species richness data were grouped into common resourcebased avian guilds that inhabit wetlands in Ontario: dabbling ducks, divers, waders, and gulls and terns (Glooschenko et al 1988). Passerines and raptors (shown on Table 1) were also recorded, but species in these guilds were not observed on ≥5 visits and so were not included in the statistical analyses.…”
Section: Waterbird Surveysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For over 20 years, wildlife biologists have proposed using avian assemblages as indicators of the impact of habitat disturbances and reclamation of damaged ecosystems (Bradfore et al 1998;Bryce et al 2002;Croonquist and Brooks, 1991;Glooschenko et al 1988;Severinghaus, 1981;Szaro, 1986). For example, Lugwig et al (1999) reported 34 avian species using lands reclaimed with native prairie species compared with 27 and 29 species using lands reclaimed with cool seasons grasses and legumes and a Eurasian meadow dominated by meadow fescue (Festuca elatior), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For over two decades investigators have proposed using avian assemblages as indicators of the impact of habitat disturbances and reclamation of damaged ecosystems (Bradford et al1991 Bryce et al, 2002;Croonquist and Brooks, 1991;Glooschenko et al 1988;Severinghaus, 1981;Szaro, 1986). In the Forest Preserve District of Dupage County, Illinois, Ludwig et al (1999) compared the composition of avian communities on lands reclaimed as native prairie planted with big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), little bluestem (Andropogon scoparius), wild rye (Emymus canadensis), switchgrass (Pa-nicum and indian grass (Sorghastrum nutans) with a forb/grass habitat, comprised of timothy (Phleum pretense), ladino clover (Trifolium hybridum) and perennial rye (Lodium pernne) and a Eurasina meadow dominated by meadow fescue (Festuca elatior).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%