2015
DOI: 10.1080/03115518.2015.1034968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ontogeny ofEllipsocephalus(Trilobita) and systematic position of Ellipsocephalidae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several issues with the definition of the new species. First, the morphology of the genal spine changes remarkably during ontogeny (Chatterton, 1980;Chatterton & Speyer, 1997;Park & Choi, 2009;Laibl et al 2015) and differences in the position of eyes can be an effect of taphonomic compression (see Hughes & Rushton, 1990 for detailed explanation). Second, genal spines in Moroccan trilobites are often artificially modified by local collectors (Gutiérrez-Marco & García-Bellido, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several issues with the definition of the new species. First, the morphology of the genal spine changes remarkably during ontogeny (Chatterton, 1980;Chatterton & Speyer, 1997;Park & Choi, 2009;Laibl et al 2015) and differences in the position of eyes can be an effect of taphonomic compression (see Hughes & Rushton, 1990 for detailed explanation). Second, genal spines in Moroccan trilobites are often artificially modified by local collectors (Gutiérrez-Marco & García-Bellido, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Laibl et al . ). Certainly, it is difficult to accept that the expanded front of the Ellipsocephalus glabella, its lack of a preglabellar field, long palpebral lobes and whole even‐width of the spineless cephalic border are elements of a Fortey's () ptychopariid, especially those of Agraulos ceticephalus .…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Further complications are present within the palaeolenids of the Guanshan Biota as the validity of P. douvillei and P. "lantenoisi" has been debated: authors have suggested that they were unable to confidently differentiate P. "lantenoisi" and P. douvillei when thoracic tergites numbers are not definitive (Hu et al, 2013). Conversely, P. longispinus is likely a valid taxon as there are a robust second thoracic tergite and hypertrophied spines on meraspid and holaspid specimens (Laibl et al, 2015). To this end, while P. longispinus is accounted for, M. deprati, P. douvillei, and P. "lantenoisi" need to be explored.…”
Section: Species Considered Relevant Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%