2019
DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30232-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The opioid death crisis in Canada: crucial lessons for public health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation is just as dire in Canada, which saw a corresponding 4,100 fatal overdoses that same year (11.2 per 100,000 population; Special Advisory Committee on the Epidemic of Opioid Overdoses, 2019). But while both nations refer to the opioid crisis as a public health emergency (Health Canada, 2019;Ending America's Opioid Crisis, 2019), concrete actions towards harm reduction and treatment options have been limited (Casey, 2016;CFMS, 2018;GAO, 2018;Warren, 2018;Fischer et al, 2019;Frank and Haffajee, 2019). Moreover, public opinion remains divided about important aspects of the opioid crisis, with opinion leaders reporting conflicting views about the severity of the situation, how best to respond to it, and who is responsible (Nanos Research, 2017;American Psychiatric Association, 2018;Angus Reid Institute, 2018;Blendon and Benson, 2018;Manchikanti et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is just as dire in Canada, which saw a corresponding 4,100 fatal overdoses that same year (11.2 per 100,000 population; Special Advisory Committee on the Epidemic of Opioid Overdoses, 2019). But while both nations refer to the opioid crisis as a public health emergency (Health Canada, 2019;Ending America's Opioid Crisis, 2019), concrete actions towards harm reduction and treatment options have been limited (Casey, 2016;CFMS, 2018;GAO, 2018;Warren, 2018;Fischer et al, 2019;Frank and Haffajee, 2019). Moreover, public opinion remains divided about important aspects of the opioid crisis, with opinion leaders reporting conflicting views about the severity of the situation, how best to respond to it, and who is responsible (Nanos Research, 2017;American Psychiatric Association, 2018;Angus Reid Institute, 2018;Blendon and Benson, 2018;Manchikanti et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provided crucial insight for guiding opioid policy and medical practice control (e.g., prescription guidance) in the distinct contexts of traditionally high opioid availability in North America, combined with evidence of only limited effectiveness of opioids for chronic pain therapy [51][52][53]. Beyond these current contexts, where illicitly produced opioids have increasingly replaced pharmaceutical-grade opioids for non-medical use, these insights may be helpful for settings where opioid availability is still low and preventive restraints can facilitate appropriate balance between opioid availability and related adverse health outcomes [5,38,54,55]. As a potentially relevant limitation for the present analyses, we note that the (general population-level) data examined did not include additional patient-level descriptors, or other data variables that could have been used to examine possibly confounding factors in the correlations assessed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provided crucial insight for guiding opioid policy and medical practice control (e.g., prescription guidance) in the distinct contexts of traditionally high opioid availability in North America, combined with evidence of only limited effectiveness of opioids for chronic pain therapy [51][52][53]. Beyond these current contexts, where illicitly produced opioids have increasingly replaced pharmaceutical-grade opioids for non-medical use, these insights may be helpful for settings where opioid availability is still low and preventive restraints can facilitate appropriate balance between opioid availability and related adverse health outcomes [5,38,54,55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%