2008
DOI: 10.1080/13691830701880194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Opportunities and Costs of Voice and Exit: Modelling Ethnic Group Rebellion and Emigration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This narrative and its migration consequences are further enhanced by Europeans’ greater exit opportunities (cf. Okamoto and Wilkes, 2008) – the ability to immigrate to and settle in Russia thanks both to the Russian immigration policies favoring the ‘return of compatriots’ and to their ethnoracial and linguistic affinity with the core of Russia’s population. In comparison, for Uzbeks, a large minority that is native to Kyrgyzstan, neighboring Uzbekistan is not a comparably symbolic anchor; moreover, Uzbekistan is a much less attractive migration destination economically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This narrative and its migration consequences are further enhanced by Europeans’ greater exit opportunities (cf. Okamoto and Wilkes, 2008) – the ability to immigrate to and settle in Russia thanks both to the Russian immigration policies favoring the ‘return of compatriots’ and to their ethnoracial and linguistic affinity with the core of Russia’s population. In comparison, for Uzbeks, a large minority that is native to Kyrgyzstan, neighboring Uzbekistan is not a comparably symbolic anchor; moreover, Uzbekistan is a much less attractive migration destination economically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, or as an alternative to, ethnic confrontation, in many multi-ethnic settings emigration of ethnic minorities has been a response to discrimination, exclusion, and threat of violence (Okamoto and Wilkes, 2008; Zolberg et al., 1989). Notably, as Okamoto and Wilkes (2008) argue, the opportunity to emigrate may play a more important role than the costs of staying in the choice of the emigration route. Paralleling the reality of many post-colonial and similar settings (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, it provides an empirical alternative to the numerous studies that have found that those with resources and vested interests (economic or otherwise) choose to stay and protest, rather than emigrate (Hirschman and Pfaff with East Germany; Colomer with Cuba). Anglophone out‐migration from Québec highlights important differences that explain why this is so: (a) voice was ineffective regardless of individuals' resource availability to invest in collective action (Okamoto and Wilkes also find that opportunities for voice matter more than costs of voice); (b) exit remained fairly cheap (especially compared to voice) and open; and (c) ethnic nationalism diminished Anglophone dominance in the economy, reducing the economic return, especially for high‐resource Anglophones with ‘louder voices’ who may have otherwise stayed and protested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of disentangling economic and political motivations for migrating should not be surprising because many of the economic changes in Québec during this period are consequences of ethno‐nationalistic policies (see Carens ; Lemco ). As Dina G. Okamoto and Rima Wilkes () state, it is often difficult to use the effects of nationalism to directly explain the options available to threatened minority ethnic groups; why some choose ‘fight’ and others choose ‘flight’. However, according to most accounts, Anglo protest during the 1970s was largely absent; as Graham Fraser (: 111) notes, ‘thousands of Anglophones, given the choice between adapting to an increasingly French‐speaking environment and moving, moved’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, emigration flows themselves are likely endogenously related to our outcome variable, as exit is often motivated by political instability and uncertainty (e.g. Davenport, Moore & Poe, 2003;Moore & Shellman, 2004;Okamoto & Wilkes, 2008). In contrast, the two factors we isolate here -state-imposed restrictions on citizens' ability to leave, and the availability of economic opportunities abroad -are less susceptible to this problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%