1978
DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(78)90138-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optical absorption of iron oxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
73
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong absorption corresponding to this 3d(Fe)-2p(O) → 3d(Fe) transition is expected. Considering shorter Fe-O bond length in Mw compared to that in pure FeO, the calculated gap of 3 eV is in reasonable agreement with an experimental absorption with stronger line around 2.4 eV in FeO [26]. The large mixing between majority Fe d states and O p states over a wide range of energies and the small contribution of O at the top of the valence band are also similar to these features observed in the density of states of FeO [12].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…A strong absorption corresponding to this 3d(Fe)-2p(O) → 3d(Fe) transition is expected. Considering shorter Fe-O bond length in Mw compared to that in pure FeO, the calculated gap of 3 eV is in reasonable agreement with an experimental absorption with stronger line around 2.4 eV in FeO [26]. The large mixing between majority Fe d states and O p states over a wide range of energies and the small contribution of O at the top of the valence band are also similar to these features observed in the density of states of FeO [12].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…The hematite was modelled using the full frequency-dependent dielectric function 51 , Au and titanium using the data of Palik 52 and SiO 2 using a refractive index of 1.4. The reported values of bulk Fe 2 O 3 vary depending on the synthesis procedure 53 . For the simulation, an absorption coefficient of 5 Â 10 4 at 500 nm was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, surveying the present literature gives clear hints that the consistent description of TM compounds is difficult within a single approach: For example, the G 0 W 0 (HSE) approach (denoting a G 0 W 0 calculation based on initial HSE calculation of wavefunctions and eigenvalues using the hybrid functional of Ref. [34]), that is considered to be reliable in main group compounds [15] gives a much too large band gap of 4.0 eV in Fe 2 O 3 [31], compared to the experimental gap at 2.1 eV [35]. The G 0 W 0 (LDA) variant, which underestimates the gap of ZnO by as much as 1 eV [7,22], already overestimates the gap by 0.3 eV in TiO 2 [30] and by 0.6 eV in SrTiO 3 [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%