2023
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Optical Light Curve of GRB 221009A: The Afterglow and the Emerging Supernova

Abstract: We present extensive optical photometry of the afterglow of GRB 221009A. Our data cover 0.9–59.9 days from the time of Swift and Fermi gamma-ray burst (GRB) detections. Photometry in rizy-band filters was collected primarily with Pan-STARRS and supplemented by multiple 1–4 m imaging facilities. We analyzed the Swift X-ray data of the afterglow and found a single decline rate power law f(t) ∝ t −1.556±0.002 best describes the light curve. In addition to the high foreground Milky Way dust extin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the size of the parameter space, the log Bayes factor prefers the simpler top-hat jet model, 0.542 ± 0.140 for the Extended data and 0.540 ± 0.136 for the GRANDMA data (see Table 2). Hence, there is no strong evidence for or against the presence of an SN contribution consistent with the nugent-hyper model combined with the models used in our analysis (see, for instance, Fulton et al 2023 for another interpretation. jets have opening angles core  q (2°.5 ± 1°.0) (Wang et al 2018).…”
Section: Properties Of the Grb Afterglow From Bayesian Inferencementioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the size of the parameter space, the log Bayes factor prefers the simpler top-hat jet model, 0.542 ± 0.140 for the Extended data and 0.540 ± 0.136 for the GRANDMA data (see Table 2). Hence, there is no strong evidence for or against the presence of an SN contribution consistent with the nugent-hyper model combined with the models used in our analysis (see, for instance, Fulton et al 2023 for another interpretation. jets have opening angles core  q (2°.5 ± 1°.0) (Wang et al 2018).…”
Section: Properties Of the Grb Afterglow From Bayesian Inferencementioning
confidence: 69%
“…The afterglow of GRB 221009A is clearly among the more luminous detected so far, but it is not egregious. Only at late times does the unbroken decay lead it to become exceptional, but we caution that these observations are not corrected for host-galaxy and SN contribution and are therefore to be taken with caution (see Fulton et al 2023 for the potential SN contribution, but see also Shrestha et al 2023).…”
Section: The Afterglow Of Grb 221009a In a Global Context: Luminous B...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, in standard synchrotron afterglow theory, we do not expect the optical afterglow to decay with the same power-law index as the X-rays (e.g., Sari et al 1998). Thus, to remove the afterglow contribution we must model the optical decay separately from the X-rays (see Fulton et al 2023 and the first approach in Shrestha et al 2023).…”
Section: Previous Broadband Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unprecedented brightness led to extensive follow up across the electromagnetic spectrum (e.g., Fulton et al 2023;Laskar et al 2023;Kann et al 2023;O'Connor et al 2023;Williams et al 2023). Spectroscopy of the optical afterglow led to a redshift measurement of z = 0.151 (de Ugarte Postigo et al 2022a;Castro-Tirado et al 2022;Malesani et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation