2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10266-021-00663-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optimal activation of plastic aligner for canine distal movement: a three-dimensional finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient of friction (μ, the ratio of frictional force to positive pressure) between teeth and CA was an important setting for the study, but the value of μ is controversial in previous studies. In the studies of Barone et al [12,24] and Li et al [25], μ was set to 0 because of the large material differences between teeth and CA and the presence of saliva as lubrication [12]. In other studies [26][27][28][29][30], μ was set to 0.2, which was similar to the friction coefficient between enamel and composite [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of friction (μ, the ratio of frictional force to positive pressure) between teeth and CA was an important setting for the study, but the value of μ is controversial in previous studies. In the studies of Barone et al [12,24] and Li et al [25], μ was set to 0 because of the large material differences between teeth and CA and the presence of saliva as lubrication [12]. In other studies [26][27][28][29][30], μ was set to 0.2, which was similar to the friction coefficient between enamel and composite [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%