2016
DOI: 10.5603/cj.a2015.0078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents

Abstract: There was no difference in efficacy outcomes between short-term and long-term DAPT following DES, even among high-risk patients. However, longer duration of DAPT was found to be associated with increased risk of major bleeding.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,[9][10][11][12]26,27 Fifteen published meta-analyses compared 3-6 months vs 12 months of DAPT. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] A consistent finding was that lower rates of bleeding were associated with shorter courses of DAPT. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]38 Thirteen meta-analyses showed no difference in ischemic or thrombotic end points with shorter courses of DAPT.…”
Section: Duration Of Dapt In Patients Treated With Pci For Acsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7,[9][10][11][12]26,27 Fifteen published meta-analyses compared 3-6 months vs 12 months of DAPT. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] A consistent finding was that lower rates of bleeding were associated with shorter courses of DAPT. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]38 Thirteen meta-analyses showed no difference in ischemic or thrombotic end points with shorter courses of DAPT.…”
Section: Duration Of Dapt In Patients Treated With Pci For Acsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] A consistent finding was that lower rates of bleeding were associated with shorter courses of DAPT. [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]38 Thirteen meta-analyses showed no difference in ischemic or thrombotic end points with shorter courses of DAPT. 29,[31][32][33][34][35][36] Meta-analyses have also evaluated longer vs shorter durations of DAPT in various patient subgroups, in which a consistent finding was that a shorter duration of DAPT might give rise to an increased risk of ischemic outcomes.…”
Section: Duration Of Dapt In Patients Treated With Pci For Acsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The current recommendations concerning the treatment of patients with ACS emphasize the need to use DAPT for 12 months following ACS, unless contraindicated due to an excessive risk of bleeding -class of recommendation I, level of evidence A. This recommendation is valid for patients both with STEMI and NSTE-ACS [2,10,36,37].…”
Section: Platelet P2y12 Receptor Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of the dual antiplatelet treatment, from ticlopidine to ticagrelor and prasugrel, through clopidogrel, significantly reduced the ST occurrence [2]. Especially, newer P2Y12 inhibitors showed a high efficacy with an overall good profile of safety and tolerability [2,3]. In addition, it is plausible that in the near future new drugs and regimens will be available that will ensure a further reduction of ST occurrence (NCT01813435 and NCT02293395).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter conditions are particularly related to drugs and devices. The introduction of the dual antiplatelet treatment, from ticlopidine to ticagrelor and prasugrel, through clopidogrel, significantly reduced the ST occurrence [2]. Especially, newer P2Y12 inhibitors showed a high efficacy with an overall good profile of safety and tolerability [2,3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%