2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2004.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optimal policy for a sampling plan in continuous production in terms of the clearance number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kobilinsky and Bertheaub (2005) determined a cost control function based on the number of groups and the total number of samples to obtain the least costly acceptance sampling plan and ensure that the risk rate of consumers and producers were below predetermined thresholds of both parties. Haji and Haji (2004) consider a special sampling plan, which has been developed for continuous production processes. The objective is to derive the total cost includes the costs of inspection, reworks, and defective items returned by the customers, and the minimum cost policy for the sampling plan.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kobilinsky and Bertheaub (2005) determined a cost control function based on the number of groups and the total number of samples to obtain the least costly acceptance sampling plan and ensure that the risk rate of consumers and producers were below predetermined thresholds of both parties. Haji and Haji (2004) consider a special sampling plan, which has been developed for continuous production processes. The objective is to derive the total cost includes the costs of inspection, reworks, and defective items returned by the customers, and the minimum cost policy for the sampling plan.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boyles [13] proposed the use of the process yield index, , to obtain an exact measure of the process yield for a process with a normal distribution. There is a one-to-one relationship between and the process yield.…”
Section: Process Fraction Nonconforming and Process Yield Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the economic objective, the inspection scheme in CSP-1 could work most effectively when the probability of nonconformity was roughly two-thirds of the value of the average outgoing quality limit (AOQL) [10]. Moreover, the different methods have been proposed for optimizing the parameters of inspection schemes in CSP-1 in a view of cost [11][12][13][14]. However, there is no agreed conclusion about how to identify the inspection scheme in CSPs whose inspection cost is the minimum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industrial practitioners often adopt continuous sampling plans to reduce inspection efforts as well as monitor process quality, as explained in the Introduction. Researchers have studied the economic design of sampling plans; i.e., finding the sampling fraction and clearance number to minimize total cost consisting mainly of inspection and penalty costs due to delivering defects to customers (Chen and Chou, 2003;Haji and Haji, 2004). However, these sampling plans are determined based on outgoing quality and average inspection fraction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%