2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(01)00074-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optimality for the distributed Kalman filtering fusion with feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
93
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A consensus step (Section 3.1) is introduced to provide consistency in the local estimates. As in [3,4], we model the local posterior with a Gaussian but develop consensus-based distributed counterpart of the optimal decentralized fusion rule [8]. We go one step further and use such Gaussian approximations in the context of local UPF as the proposal distribution.…”
Section: Consensus-based Distributed Upfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consensus step (Section 3.1) is introduced to provide consistency in the local estimates. As in [3,4], we model the local posterior with a Gaussian but develop consensus-based distributed counterpart of the optimal decentralized fusion rule [8]. We go one step further and use such Gaussian approximations in the context of local UPF as the proposal distribution.…”
Section: Consensus-based Distributed Upfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In majority papers autonomous systems [1,2,3,6,12] are considered. A control, if introduced, is a known input [5] or depends on local state estimate [7], only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the fusion center optimally estimates the object by using all received local estimates. Recently, to overcome the disadvantages of the centralized estimation, various decentralized and parallel versions of the standard Kalman filters have been proposed for linear dynamic systems with a multisensor environment [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%