1990
DOI: 10.1177/0013164490504004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Optimization of Generalizability Studies with Resource Constraints

Abstract: Generalizability theory is a measurement theory that provides a framework for examining the dependability of behavioral measurements. When limited resources are available determining the appropriate number of conditions to use in a measurement design is not a simple task. This paper presents a methodology for determining the optimal number of observations to use in a measurement design when resource constraints are imposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To minimize relative error subject to the cost constraint, cn l n r B, we find the stationary points of the LaGrange function, F(n l , n r , l) = s 2 (d) À l(cn l n r B): Marcoulides and Goldstein (1990) showed these points to be…”
Section: Optimal Sample Sizes For the T3l3r Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To minimize relative error subject to the cost constraint, cn l n r B, we find the stationary points of the LaGrange function, F(n l , n r , l) = s 2 (d) À l(cn l n r B): Marcoulides and Goldstein (1990) showed these points to be…”
Section: Optimal Sample Sizes For the T3l3r Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative is to numerically optimize the LaGrange function through computer intensive methods or adjust the expression for relative error variance in some way to simplify the problem. Marcoulides and Goldstein (1990) chose the latter and obtained an upper bound to the relative error variance by eliminating facet sample size terms from the equation. Their choice of terms to eliminate was arbitrary and can lead to optimized relative error variance that notably differs from the numerical solution.…”
Section: Optimal Sample Sizes For the T3r3(s : L) Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When costs for conditions for various measurement facets (e.g., development cost per task, cost per rater) included in a given measurement design are known in advance, an optimization algorithm can be used to compute maximum reliability coefficients that take into account budget constraints for the testing process(Marcoulides & Goldstein, 1990;1992). However, since the current study was a prototyping study in which the main focus of the study were to evaluate a range of possible task types and several rating schemes, the costs for tasks, test administration, and raters for operational tests were not yet fully known at the time the study was undertaken.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performing a generalizability analysis to pinpoint the sources of measurement error allows the researcher to determine how many conditions of each facet are needed (e.g., number of items, number of occasions) to obtain an optimal level of generalizability (Marcoulides & Goldstein, 1990). The items, in the design presented in Table 2, represent a source of measurement error.…”
Section: Generalizability Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%