2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-013-0834-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optimization of GPS positioning using response surface methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As research shows, minimal elevation mask is one of the factors that influence the accuracy of measurements the most [31]. Each of GPS-only, GLONASS-only and GNSS processing were made in three different minimal elevation cut-off angles: 10°, 25° and 30°.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As research shows, minimal elevation mask is one of the factors that influence the accuracy of measurements the most [31]. Each of GPS-only, GLONASS-only and GNSS processing were made in three different minimal elevation cut-off angles: 10°, 25° and 30°.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of RSM is to optimize response variable which is affected by experimental factors. There are two main types of Response Surface Designs: 1) Central Composite Designs (Coruh and Elevli, 2014;Arslan et al, 2014;Coruh and Elevli, 2015;Çetintaş and Bingöl, 2016) and 2) Box-Behnken Designs (Çoruh et al, 2012;Sisman, 2014;Sisman and Sisman, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%