The OralChromaTM CHM-2: a comparison with the OralChromaTM CHM-1

Laleman, Isabelle; Dekeyser, Christel; Wylleman, Astrid; Teughels, Wim; Quirynen, Marc

doi:10.1007/s00784-019-03148-9

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…To these volatile substances belong sulfur compounds, aromatic compounds, amines, short-chain fatty or organic acids, alcohols, aliphatic compounds, aldehydes, and ketones (Table 1) [25,[30][31][32][33]. It is considered that hydrogen sulfide, methyl mercaptan, and dimethyl sulfide are the main volatile compounds in IOH [34][35][36][37]. In many studies, the measurement of malodor substances concerns only volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs).…”

Section: Volatile Compoundsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Role of Oral Microbiota in Intra-Oral Halitosis

Hampelska

Jaworska

Babalska

et al. 2020

JCM

103

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Halitosis is a common ailment concerning 15% to 60% of the human population. Halitosis can be divided into extra-oral halitosis (EOH) and intra-oral halitosis (IOH). The IOH is formed by volatile compounds, which are produced mainly by anaerobic bacteria. To these odorous substances belong volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), aromatic compounds, amines, short-chain fatty or organic acids, alcohols, aliphatic compounds, aldehydes, and ketones. The most important VSCs are hydrogen sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide, and methyl mercaptan. VSCs can be toxic for human cells even at low concentrations. The oral bacteria most related to halitosis are Actinomyces spp., Bacteroides spp., Dialister spp., Eubacterium spp., Fusobacterium spp., Leptotrichia spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., Porphyromonas spp., Prevotella spp., Selenomonas spp., Solobacterium spp., Tannerella forsythia, and Veillonella spp. Most bacteria that cause halitosis are responsible for periodontitis, but they can also affect the development of oral and digestive tract cancers. Malodorous agents responsible for carcinogenesis are hydrogen sulfide and acetaldehyde.

show abstract

Section: Volatile Compoundsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In many studies, the measurement of malodor substances concerns only volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs). The most commonly used are VSC monitors, such as the Halimeter (Interscan, Chatsworth, USA) [11,36,[38][39][40][41]. This method has a significant disadvantage because the measure of dimethyl sulfide is not exact [42].…”

Section: Volatile Compoundsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Oral Microbiota in Intra-Oral Halitosis

Hampelska

Jaworska

Babalska

et al. 2020

JCM

103

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Concerning the agreement between "judges, " this can be improved by standardizing the sense of smell, using different odor solution kits (e.g., T&T Olfactometer R , Daiichi Yakuhin Sangyo, Tokyo, Japan). At the same time, for better inter-judge agreement, patients should refrain from oral hygiene practices, smoking, ingesting antibiotics and meals with garlic, onion, and spices before the measurement; moreover, inter-judge agreement increases if they themselves also avoid drinking coffee and tea, smoking, and using cosmetics with odor before the organoleptic tests (45).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Role of Probiotics in Halitosis of Oral Origin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Studies

López-Valverde

Sousa

et al. 2022

Front. Nutr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Halitosis or oral malodor is a condition caused by the putrefaction of sulfur-containing amino acids. It affects 30–50% of the population and causes social rejection, reducing quality of life, and self-esteem. Probiotics, especially Lactobacillus species, have been proposed for the treatment of genuine halitosis, due to their ability to reduce bacterial colonization. Our objective was to evaluate their use for the treatment of oral halitosis. Applying the PRISMA statement guidelines, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for scientific articles from the last 15 years, up to July 2021. The keywords used were “Probiotics”; “Halitosis”; “Mouth diseases”; “Oral health”; “Humans”; “Randomized Clinical Trials” according to the question, “Are probiotics effective for the reduction or elimination of oral halitosis?” Fourteen studies were identified, although only four met the inclusion criteria. We evaluated 283 participants treated with two different probiotics, with a follow-up of at least 2 weeks. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. A fixed-effects meta-analysis was performed. No statistical significance was found (p = 0.53). Despite the limitations of this meta-analysis, we believe that some probiotics have a beneficial effect on halitosis, although more clinical trials are needed to establish real evidence on this aspect.Systematic Review Registration:https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.9.0009, identifier: INPLASY20211900.

show abstract

“…Halitosis is known to be associated with high levels of VSCs, with hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), methyl mercaptan (CH 3 SH) and dimethyl sulfide (CH 3 SCH 3 ) as the major VSCs causing halitosis [1,9]. Gas chromatography is considered the gold standard method for differentiating between the three VSC gases associated with halitosis [10]. OralChroma TM is a commercially available portable gas chromatography that can be used in the clinic to detect and measure the major VSCs, which consequently aids in the monitoring and management of halitosis [11][12][13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Halitosis in Children Undergoing Full Mouth Rehabilitation under General Anesthesia

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interventions and management modalities of pediatric halitosis have been suggested in the literature, however, the effect of full mouth rehabilitation (FMR) under general anesthesia (GA) on pediatric halitosis was not reported. Therefore, the present study was conducted to investigate parents’ perceptions of their child’s halitosis before and after FMR under GA; and to evaluate the effect of FMR on clinical halitosis. Fifty-seven children between 3–8 years old, scheduled for FMR under GA, were included after satisfying the inclusion criteria and upon parental consent. Parents’ perception of halitosis in their children was evaluated using a standardized questionnaire and a breath sample was collected to assess the level of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) using OralChromaTM before and after FMR under GA. Sixty percent (n = 34) of the parents perceived halitosis in their children before FMR and about 80% (n = 27) of them reported improvement in halitosis after FMR. Clinical halitosis was detected in 84.2% (n = 48) of the sample before treatment. A statistically significant reduction in halitosis was found in 56.3% (n = 27) of the children after treatment (p < 0.001). In conclusion, majority of parents perceived an absence or reduction of halitosis in their children following FMR and significant improvement of clinical halitosis.

show abstract

The OralChromaTM CHM-2: a comparison with the OralChromaTM CHM-1

Cited by 11 publications

References 22 publications

The Role of Oral Microbiota in Intra-Oral Halitosis

The Role of Oral Microbiota in Intra-Oral Halitosis

Role of Probiotics in Halitosis of Oral Origin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Studies

Halitosis in Children Undergoing Full Mouth Rehabilitation under General Anesthesia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About