2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1805.07750
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The orbit method and analysis of automorphic forms

Paul D. Nelson,
Akshay Venkatesh

Abstract: We develop the orbit method in a quantitative form, along the lines of microlocal analysis, and apply it to the analytic theory of automorphic forms.Our main global application is an asymptotic formula for averages of Gan-Gross-Prasad periods in arbitrary rank. The automorphic form on the larger group is held fixed, while that on the smaller group varies over a family of size roughly the fourth root of the conductors of the corresponding L-functions. Ratner's results on measure classification provide an import… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…dilated) or high center often exclude these narrow classes and thus, does not usually become fruitful to yield subconvex bound of an L-function which has conductor drop, see e.g. [2,26,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…dilated) or high center often exclude these narrow classes and thus, does not usually become fruitful to yield subconvex bound of an L-function which has conductor drop, see e.g. [2,26,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, for a pair of groups H ≤ G and their representations π and Π respectively, it is an interesting question to asymptotically evaluate moments of the central L-values of the Rankin-Selberg (if defined) product Π ⊗ π. Previously, in [26] Nelson-Venkatesh asymptotically evaluated the first moment keeping Π fixed and letting π vary over a dilated Plancherel ball when (G, H) are Gan-Gross-Prasad pairs, more interestingly, allowing arbitrary weights in the spectral side. More recently in [25] Nelson proved a Lindelöf-consistent upper bound of the second moment for the groups (G, H) = (U(n + 1), U(n)) in the split case keeping π fixed and letting Π vary over a Plancherel ball with high center.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%