1951
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1951.9712800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Order of Dominance Among Conceptual Capacities: An Experimental Test of Heidbreder'S Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1954
1954
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps not all dimensions are scanned on all in- stances. There is evidence that humans exhibit a systematic order of dominance in scanning dimensions (Dattman & Israel, 1951;Grant, 1951;Heidbreder, 1945). The design of the stimuli and length of exposure interval in Exp.…”
Section: Experiments IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps not all dimensions are scanned on all in- stances. There is evidence that humans exhibit a systematic order of dominance in scanning dimensions (Dattman & Israel, 1951;Grant, 1951;Heidbreder, 1945). The design of the stimuli and length of exposure interval in Exp.…”
Section: Experiments IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Heidbreder (1947) has demonstrated with adult 5s a dominance hierarchy in concept learning and sorting, in which object, form, and number concepts occupy in this order decreasing positions in the hierarchy; and Brian & Goodenough (1929) have similarly demonstrated with children the relative dominance of color and form. Others have shown that specific stimulus attributes may affect their relative dominance (Dattman & Israel, 1951;Heidbreder, 1952;Stevenson & McBee, 1958). Furthermore, it is reasonable to assume that where alternative possibilities for categorizing exist the preference, interest, or experience of ,5 will affect his performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for a few studies (e.g., 5,13), little attempt has been made to quantify and systematically examine the variable of task complexity in concept formation and problem solving. Most previous studies have considered such variables as distribution of practice (4,8,16), previous experience (1,2,7,14), and nature of concepts to be attained (3,6,11). Two recent theoretical papers (12,17) suggest that the variable of task complexity might be quantified by using probability measures as defined by information theory (10,IS).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%