2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2094517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

'The Ordinary Diet of the Law': The Presumption Against Preemption in the Roberts Court

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These standards, which are usually more design-based than performancebased, range from specifying the control and display requirements for onboard indicators, to rear-visibility camera requirements, to impact protection and crash survivability requirements [136]- [139]. State tort law complements and expands upon these requirements, and may impose additional requirements for vehicle design or construction, by imposing liability on manufacturers under certain circumstances [140]. Drivers are regulated primarily by state governments, who license operators and are responsible for setting traffic and safety rules [138].…”
Section: ) Identifying the Primary Regulatory Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These standards, which are usually more design-based than performancebased, range from specifying the control and display requirements for onboard indicators, to rear-visibility camera requirements, to impact protection and crash survivability requirements [136]- [139]. State tort law complements and expands upon these requirements, and may impose additional requirements for vehicle design or construction, by imposing liability on manufacturers under certain circumstances [140]. Drivers are regulated primarily by state governments, who license operators and are responsible for setting traffic and safety rules [138].…”
Section: ) Identifying the Primary Regulatory Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%