2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2019.103923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The organic signature of an experimental meat-cooking fireplace: The identification of nitrogen compounds and their archaeological potential

Abstract: A better understanding of the operation and use of prehistoric fires is fundamental to interpreting the organization of living spaces. Following a previous study that focused on the organic signatures of fireplaces fueled with wood and/or bones, this study targeted the completion of an experimental reference database through the addition of a wood-fueled fireplace dedicated to the cooking of meat. Different sedimentary features of this experimental fireplace were visually identified (e.g. darkening, reddening)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 90 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large number of proteins and amino acids present in meat can explain these high levels of nitrogen. Therefore, when meat is exposed to high temperatures, such as those that occur during cooking, nitrogen-rich compounds are produced, as amides, N-heterocyclic and N-aromatic compounds [54,55]. The additional detection of anthracene and vanillin, produced during the pyrolysis of lignin during cooking [55], supports this conclusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The large number of proteins and amino acids present in meat can explain these high levels of nitrogen. Therefore, when meat is exposed to high temperatures, such as those that occur during cooking, nitrogen-rich compounds are produced, as amides, N-heterocyclic and N-aromatic compounds [54,55]. The additional detection of anthracene and vanillin, produced during the pyrolysis of lignin during cooking [55], supports this conclusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%