2012
DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2011.643367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The organisational structure of urban environmental stewardship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using New York City's social network data [11] and vegetation data for 2000 and 2010 mapped to neighborhoods, the researchers were able to assess whether the presence of stewardship organizations affected vegetation change. They found that, although on average there was very little vegetation change at the neighborhood scale during this time period, there was a statistically significant relationship between the number of stewardship groups at the neighborhood level and whether those neighborhoods experienced changes in vegetation cover.…”
Section: Lens 5: Landscape/network Spatial Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using New York City's social network data [11] and vegetation data for 2000 and 2010 mapped to neighborhoods, the researchers were able to assess whether the presence of stewardship organizations affected vegetation change. They found that, although on average there was very little vegetation change at the neighborhood scale during this time period, there was a statistically significant relationship between the number of stewardship groups at the neighborhood level and whether those neighborhoods experienced changes in vegetation cover.…”
Section: Lens 5: Landscape/network Spatial Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it was suggested to establish a knowledge platform or platforms with a particular focus on cities. These are envisioned to be accessible and open for knowledge gathering, aggregating, and cocreating as a NbS stewardship community (Bodin and Crona 2009, Crona and Hubacek 2010, Fisher et al 2012) that adheres to the principles of knowledge sharing (Connolly et al 2013, Debarbieux et al 2014) and generative learning (Richter et al 2015). In conjunction with the NbS stewardship community, the second proposal for knowledge valorization includes the empowerment of NbS ambassadors to promote NbS and engage in a science-community advocacy for NbS by making NbS benefits and risks communicable to citizens and politicians alike.…”
Section: Opportunities Facilitating Action For Nbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They stress the critical importance of understanding the social dimension of natural resource governance, including the key role of social networks-the interactions between diverse stakeholders such as resource users, activists and knowledge holders, institutional actors, and entrepreneurs-for generating trust and resolving conflict around natural resource management (Ernstson et al 2010, Fisher et al 2012, Page 2014. Scholars have pointed to the role of informal networks of individuals and organizations (versus hierarchical formal institutions) for potentially overcoming problems of commonpool resources, where responsibility is shared among a diverse array of actors .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%