2013
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin and evolution of genomic imprinting and viviparity in mammals

Abstract: Genomic imprinting is widespread in eutherian mammals. Marsupial mammals also have genomic imprinting, but in fewer loci. It has long been thought that genomic imprinting is somehow related to placentation and/or viviparity in mammals, although neither is restricted to mammals. Most imprinted genes are expressed in the placenta. There is no evidence for genomic imprinting in the egg-laying monotreme mammals, despite their short-lived placenta that transfers nutrients from mother to embryo. Post natal genomic i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
140
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
4
140
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation confirmed an earlier report of abnormal hypomethylation of KvDMR1 and expression of KCNQ1OT1 in two of seven SCNT cloned calves and one of two IVP-derived calves (Hori et al 2010). Although generally highly conserved, there are also recognisable differences in imprinting within eutherian mammals that could account for many such differences between species, differential imprinting at the IGF2R locus being a case in point (Das et al 2009;Renfree et al 2013).…”
Section: Epigenetic Programming Of Long-term Developmentsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This observation confirmed an earlier report of abnormal hypomethylation of KvDMR1 and expression of KCNQ1OT1 in two of seven SCNT cloned calves and one of two IVP-derived calves (Hori et al 2010). Although generally highly conserved, there are also recognisable differences in imprinting within eutherian mammals that could account for many such differences between species, differential imprinting at the IGF2R locus being a case in point (Das et al 2009;Renfree et al 2013).…”
Section: Epigenetic Programming Of Long-term Developmentsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In animals, genomic imprinting is only known in therian mammals, and most imprinted genes are expressed and imprinted in the brain and placenta (Pask, 2012;Keverne, 2013;Renfree et al, 2013). Having the full catalog of imprinted genes in several different mammalian species will greatly facilitate the understanding of many evolutionary questions about genomic imprinting, including but not limited to origin and fixation of genomic imprinting, conservation of degree of expression direction and imprinted genes, dynamic gain and loss of imprinting status on the mammalian phylogenetic tree and effect of loss of diploidy for imprinted genes in shaping the population genetic profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such effects are expected because during development, power over phenotypes is commonly (i) some function of time, because events earlier in ontogeny have larger, more-cascading effects, and (ii) some function of control over rates and patterns of cell and tissue proliferation, because this is how organisms grow and differentiate. This prediction is well supported by recent studies showing that in a wide range of human tissues, imprinted genes orchestrate stem cell replication versus inhibition [96][97][98], and by the observation that imprinted genes exert especially pervasive effects on placental development, at the start of fetal growth and development [99,100]. Imprintedgene conflicts will therefore be especially important in mediating causes of variation in physical health, because so many human health outcomes are highly dependent on early-life events and phenotypes such as placental function and birth weight [101], and on the roles of stem cells in tissue renewal and repair.…”
Section: (D) Intragenomic Conflicts Mediate Disease Risks and Phenotypesmentioning
confidence: 66%