1908
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.30676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin of a land flora : a theory based upon the facts of alternation / by F. O. Bower. With numerous illustrations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

1945
1945
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that all rhizomorphic lycopsids (sensu 20–23 ) form a monophyletic group, and that extinct stigmarian rootlets were interpreted as modified leaves this suggested that the rootlets of all rhizomorphic lycopsids were modified leaves, including the rootlets of extant Isoetes 3 . The interpretation that the rootlets of extant Isoetes species were modified leaves was strikingly at odds with all previous descriptions of Isoetes rootlets that had always been interpreted as roots similar to the roots of other extant lycopsids 11,24–32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Given that all rhizomorphic lycopsids (sensu 20–23 ) form a monophyletic group, and that extinct stigmarian rootlets were interpreted as modified leaves this suggested that the rootlets of all rhizomorphic lycopsids were modified leaves, including the rootlets of extant Isoetes 3 . The interpretation that the rootlets of extant Isoetes species were modified leaves was strikingly at odds with all previous descriptions of Isoetes rootlets that had always been interpreted as roots similar to the roots of other extant lycopsids 11,24–32 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…T h e number of leaf teeth varies in stems of different diameter and bears no constant relation to the three rows of segments proceeding from the division of the apical initial. Thus Bower (1908Bower ( , 1935 has pointed out that in this instance, as in many others taken from pteridophytes, apical segmentation does not dominate, or determine in any precise manner, the number and position of the lateral members, i.e. segmentation does not determine organogeny.…”
Section: Genesis and Histogenesismentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Thus Bower (1908Bower ( , 1935 has pointed out that in this instance, as in many others taken from pteridophytes, apical segmentation does not dominate, or determine in any precise manner, the number and position of the lateral members, i.e. T o those who entertained views of a strictly formal and rigid kind it seemed reasonable to expect that a close and obligate relationship would be found ; and they therefore tended to generalize from those instances in which, as a fact, new organs or tissues do arise in a consistent and regular manner in relation to the segmentation of the apical cell.…”
Section: Genesis and Histogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the key innovations of land plants was the evolution of a mutlicellular diploid generation, the embryo, via mitoses interpolated between gamete fusion and meiosis (Bower, 1908). In seed plants, ferns, and mosses KNOX1 activity is associated with continued cell proliferation, including sporophyte apical meristem activity (Hay and Tsiantis, 2010, Sakakibara et al, 2008, Sano et al, 2005.…”
Section: Roles Of Mpknox1 In the Marchantia Sporophytementioning
confidence: 99%