The Origin of Cosmic Rays 1964
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-013526-7.50011-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Origin of Cosmic Rays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
824
2
13

Year Published

1970
1970
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,017 publications
(862 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
23
824
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…independent of energy, may both be indica • ,ions of a possible primary extragalactic origin. usin g rough energetics ar guments (Ginzburg and Syrovatskii 1964) one can estimate that leaka ge from normal galaxies would produce an extragalactic cosmic ray component with a flux (T ex/Z galiv ~NG 10 -5 -10 -4 • For active galaxies, these estimates…”
Section: Antimatter In the Cosmic Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…independent of energy, may both be indica • ,ions of a possible primary extragalactic origin. usin g rough energetics ar guments (Ginzburg and Syrovatskii 1964) one can estimate that leaka ge from normal galaxies would produce an extragalactic cosmic ray component with a flux (T ex/Z galiv ~NG 10 -5 -10 -4 • For active galaxies, these estimates…”
Section: Antimatter In the Cosmic Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a relation would be expected in a scenario where the VHE emission has an hadronic origin: the accelerated cosmic rays (CRs, protons or heavier nuclei) interact with the surrounding material, leading to VHE emission through the decay of the produced π 0 (Ginzburg & Syrovatskii 1964). This emission can be boosted by the presence of an enhancement of target material above the ISM contribution (see e.g., Aharonian et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The steady state spectrum of secondary electrons can be obtained using again Eq. (6) appropriately modified as follows: i) the injection term Q e (E e ) must be added on the left side; ii) the loss termĖ e (R, E) is now dominated by Coulomb, Bremsstrahlung and synchrotron losses [14] and it is both space and energy dependent; iii) as boundary condition we assumed that the particle distribution function for secondary electron vanishes outside the cloud, where the gas density is low with inefficient production of secondaries.…”
Section: Solution Of the Transport Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%