2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin of high magnetic remanence in fault pseudotachylites: Theoretical considerations and implication for coseismic electrical currents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
59
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the most common primary ferromagnetic (s.l.) minerals in fault pseudotachylytes are magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ), and maghemite, (g-Fe 2 O 3 ) [Nakamura and Nagahama, 2001;Fukuchi, 2003;Ferré et al, 2005;Hirono et al, 2006;Zechmeister et al, 2007;Molina Garza et al, 2009]. Post-seismic alteration of these minerals generally leads to formation of more oxidized phases: At Santa Rosa, opaque grains in the pseudotachylyte, identified using optical and electron microscopy, are dominated by euhedral magnetite grains (<5 mm).…”
Section: Ferromagnetic Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the most common primary ferromagnetic (s.l.) minerals in fault pseudotachylytes are magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ), and maghemite, (g-Fe 2 O 3 ) [Nakamura and Nagahama, 2001;Fukuchi, 2003;Ferré et al, 2005;Hirono et al, 2006;Zechmeister et al, 2007;Molina Garza et al, 2009]. Post-seismic alteration of these minerals generally leads to formation of more oxidized phases: At Santa Rosa, opaque grains in the pseudotachylyte, identified using optical and electron microscopy, are dominated by euhedral magnetite grains (<5 mm).…”
Section: Ferromagnetic Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TRM acquisition is inevitably coseismic due to the quasi instantaneous cooling of the pseudotachylyte melt [Nakamura et al, 2002;Ferré et al, 2005], the timing of CRM acquisition is less well understood. In addition, TRM is generally carried by magnetite, while CRM is typically borne by hematite or goethite, as shown, for example, in a recent study of pseudotachylytes in the Chiapas Massif, southern Mexico [Molina Garza et al, 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic susceptibility and rock magnetism have commonly been used to understand the physical characteristics and chemical processes of fault slip zones (Enomoto and Zheng 1998;Nakamura and Nagahama 2001;Ferré et al 2005Ferré et al , 2012. Correlations have been reported between magnetic susceptibility anomalies in borehole log data and the presence of cataclastic zones and faults in the main drill borehole of the German Deep Drilling Project (KTB) (Bosum et al 1997), but the magnetic susceptibility of drill cuttings in the KTB do not support this correlation (Rauen et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, ferrimagnetic minerals in the fault slip zone may acquire a thermal remanent magnetization (TRM) upon cooling (Piper and Poppleton 1988;Ferré et al 2014). Second, earthquake lightning may constitute an additional magnetization process (Enomoto and Zheng 1998;Ferré et al 2005). Third, a fault slip zone may acquire chemical remanent magnetization (CRM) due to neoformation of ferrimagnetic minerals by thermal decomposition during seismic slips (Nakamura et al 2002;Fukuchi 2003;Fukuchi et al 2005;Hirono et al 2006;Chou et al 2012); it can be explained that many kinds of antiferromagnetic or paramagnetic minerals are thermally decomposed into ferrimagnetic minerals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%