2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin of in situ hybridization – A personal history

Abstract: In situ hybridization is the technique by which specific RNA or DNA molecules are detected in cytological preparations. Basically it involves formation of a hybrid molecule between an endogenous single-stranded RNA or DNA in the cell and a complementary single-stranded RNA or DNA probe. In its original form the probe was labeled with 3H and the hybrid was detected by autoradiography. The first successful experiments in 1968 involved detection of the highly amplified ribosomal DNA in oocytes of the frog Xenopus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…B-allele frequency plot ratio of 0: 0.4: 0.6: 1) [9]. Mosaic deletion for whole chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6,7,9,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 20 and 22 were observed, consistent with monosomy for these chromosomes. Chromosomes 8, 10 and 21 showed a normal heterozygous B-allele frequency distribution (0: 0.5: 1) consistent with disomy for these chromosomes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…B-allele frequency plot ratio of 0: 0.4: 0.6: 1) [9]. Mosaic deletion for whole chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6,7,9,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19, 20 and 22 were observed, consistent with monosomy for these chromosomes. Chromosomes 8, 10 and 21 showed a normal heterozygous B-allele frequency distribution (0: 0.5: 1) consistent with disomy for these chromosomes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Microarrays and next generation sequencing are advanced, lengthy and costly techniques, which are incorporated into routine testing to detect genome aberrations. FISH is a relatively old technique developed in the early 1980s [12][13][14], but remains an essential tool for the detection of specific biomarkers such as BCR-ABL1 gene fusion, HER2 and ALK gene rearrangements, and has become crucial in the development of personalised medicine [13]. Nevertheless, it remains a rapid, economical and reliable technique in the detection of balanced rearrangement and more importantly in the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies were employed to study genome 3D structure 35 : One is genome mapping techniques, including ligation-based and ligation-free methods; another is in situ imaging of DNA, RNA, and protein in the nucleus; and the last one is computational methods to predict either chromatin interactions or 3D chromatin organization 6 . Among these strategies, 3C-derivative methods rely on digestion and proximity ligation to capture pair-wise 5,7 or multiple chromatin contacts 8 , while ligation-free methods, such as Genome Architecture Mapping (GAM) 9 , Split-Pool Recognition of Interactions by Tag Extension (SPRITE) 10 , and ChIA-Drop 11 can detect multiple chromatin interactions genome-wide, by demonstrating that multiple enhancers and highly transcribed regions are associated simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial reports of in situ hybridization achieved denaturation either with high temperatures or chemically, with NaOH or salts (John et al, 1969;Buongiorno-Nardelli and Amaldi, 1970;Barsacchi and Gall, 1972;Gall, 2016). Subsequent research favored the use of formamide at a concentration of 50-70 % in the hybridization buffer, in order to lower hybridization temperature and efficiently denature DNA/RNA (see for example (Barbera et al, 1979;Bauman et al, 1980;Gerhard et al, 1981;Hafen et al, 1983;Levine et al, 1983;Braissant and Wahli, 1998;Brown, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%