1993
DOI: 10.1016/0377-0273(93)90042-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin of Mount St. Helens andesites

Abstract: Eruption of these magmatic variants within the same eruptive phase implies the existence of different petrogenetic lineages, and that the plumbing system is sufficiently complex to simultaneously isolate and preserve numerous magma batches. It is unlikely that any of the andesites (or dacites) are derived by fractional crystallization of the recognized basaltic variants. Formation of the andesites simply by contamination (or assimilation-fractional crystallization) of basaltic magma is also improbable. More pl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
13
3
Order By: Relevance
“…). This is in partial contrast to the model of Smith & Leeman () who argued that intermediate composition rocks at MSH were the result of mixing and fractional crystallization.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…). This is in partial contrast to the model of Smith & Leeman () who argued that intermediate composition rocks at MSH were the result of mixing and fractional crystallization.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…These melts are most likely generated from underplated meta‐gabbros at the base of the continental crust, as shallowly emplaced basaltic units would not be at a sufficient metamorphic grade to produce the typical adakitic geochemical characteristics. One additional aspect of our model that differs from that of Smith & Leeman (, ) is that the present model does not require mixing with a basaltic component to produce the andesites at MSH. If mixing is taking place, it is likely to be between a metamorphosed basalt/gabbroic melt and a slab MORB‐melt, as indicated by some of the geochemical data lying between those two end‐members (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the basis of the available geochemical and Sr–Nd–Pb isotope data we interpret here that the pitchstone source magma is entirely of crustal derivation. The partial melting of crustal components is quite common in subduction‐related magmatic arcs (Smith & Leeman 1993; Morris & Creaser 1998). The Nd model ages indicate an Early Mesoproterozoic crustal residence age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%