2020
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-01205-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin of Rhinocerotoidea and phylogeny of Ceratomorpha (Mammalia, Perissodactyla)

Abstract: Rhinoceroses have been considered to have originated from tapiroids in the middle Eocene; however, the transition remains controversial, and the first unequivocal rhinocerotoids appeared about 4 Ma later than the earliest tapiroids of the Early Eocene. Here we describe 5 genera and 6 new species of rhinoceroses recently discovered from the early Eocene to the early middle Eocene deposits of the Erlian Basin of Inner Mongolia, China. These new materials represent the earliest members of rhinocerotoids, forsterc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent publications refined the phylogenetic relationships within Rhinocerotoidea (Wang et al, 2016;Tissier et al, 2018;Tissier, Antoine, & Becker, 2020;Bai et al, 2020) and within Ceratomorpha (Bai et al, 2020), although not including all genera of rhinocerotoids currently known worldwide.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent publications refined the phylogenetic relationships within Rhinocerotoidea (Wang et al, 2016;Tissier et al, 2018;Tissier, Antoine, & Becker, 2020;Bai et al, 2020) and within Ceratomorpha (Bai et al, 2020), although not including all genera of rhinocerotoids currently known worldwide.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To take into account the effect of phylogeny on shape variation, we constructed a composite cladogram using trees previously computed on cranio-dental and postcranial characters or molecular data. We reconstructed interspecific relationships, branch lengths and occurrence dates after the works of Cerdeño (1995), Antoine (2002), Antoine, Duranthon, & Welcomme (2003), Antoine et al (2010), Prothero (2005), Boada-Saña (2008), Piras et al (2010), Becker, Antoine, & Maridet (2013), Lu (2013), Wang et al (2016), Averianov et al (2017), Tissier et al (2018), Tissier, Antoine, & Becker (2020), Bai et al (2020). We used the cladistic framework of Antoine et al (2003) and Becker et al (2013) to define families, subfamilies, tribes and subtribes (Fig.…”
Section: Phylogenetic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kwangoclupea forms the sister group to Codoichthys and lies in a relatively basal position in the two SCTs, whereas it lies in a relatively derived position and belongs to the Paraclupeidae in the two BITs. These differences between the general topologies of the SCTs and BITs are probably due to the fact that the information contained in the dataset is insufficient to draw firm conclusions about their relationships as pointed out in the recent analyses of the phylogeny of Ceratomorpha (Bai et al, 2020). To improve the understanding of relationships of the group, more phylogenetically informative fossils and more complete data are needed.…”
Section: Discussion Phylogenetic Relationships Of the New Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses use both parsimony and Bayesian inference methods, for both methods have advantages and disadvantages for morphological data ( Bai et al, 2020 ). The parsimony analyses were performed with TNT 1.5 ( Goloboff, Farris & Nixon, 2008 ), using the Traditional Search method with 1000 replicates and tree bisection and reconnection (TBR) swapping algorithm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%