2005
DOI: 10.1086/497282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Origins of Two Classes of Carbon‐enhanced, Metal‐poor Stars

Abstract: We have compiled composition, luminosity, and binarity information for carbon-enhanced, metal-poor (CEMP) stars reported by recent studies. We divided the CEMP star sample into two classes having high and low abundances, respectively, of the s-process elements and consider the abundances of several isotopes, in particular, 12 C, 13 C, and 14 N, as well as the likely evolutionary stages of each star. Despite the fact that objects in both groups were selected from the same surveys (primarily the HK survey), with… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
94
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as already noted by Aoki et al (2007), some main sequence CEMP-no stars exist with similar N enhancements and similar 12 C/ 13 C ratios as CEMP-no giants (Fig. 19), thus ruling out the hypothesis of Ryan et al (2005). Therefore, if supernovae and/or massive winds are responsible for the C, N, and isotopic ratios, the yields from these objects must already bear the signature of CN-processed material at the time it leaves the massive star.…”
Section: Absence Of Neutron-capture Signaturesupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, as already noted by Aoki et al (2007), some main sequence CEMP-no stars exist with similar N enhancements and similar 12 C/ 13 C ratios as CEMP-no giants (Fig. 19), thus ruling out the hypothesis of Ryan et al (2005). Therefore, if supernovae and/or massive winds are responsible for the C, N, and isotopic ratios, the yields from these objects must already bear the signature of CN-processed material at the time it leaves the massive star.…”
Section: Absence Of Neutron-capture Signaturesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…1, there is a lack of radial-velocity measurements to constrain the binary rate of CEMP-no stars. Ryan et al (2005) observed that all CEMP-no stars in their compilation were post-main-sequence stars, leading these authors to suggest that CEMP-no stars have undergone first dredgeup and have processed some pristine C into N themselves. In their scenario, CEMP-no stars were born out of gas with high C content from pollution by (possibly) low-energy supernovae or winds from massive stars, C that was then processed to produce the high N and low 12 C/ 13 C in the CEMP-no stars in their sample.…”
Section: Absence Of Neutron-capture Signaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with the observed low 12 C/ 13 C ratios (see e.g. Ryan et al 2005 andHansen et al 2015a, and references therein), this points towards a large amount of mixing that is not included in their models. Recent work by Abate et al (2015a,b), employing models of AGB nucleosynthesis production from Karakas (2010), reaches better agreement for some stars, while for others they have the same problem as Bisterzo et al (2012).…”
Section: Nucleosynthesis Challengesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The CEMP stars with [Ba/Fe] < 0 were called CEMP-no by Ryan et al (2005). However, some of the stars in the literature with [Ba/Fe] < 0 might be CEMP-r, rather than CEMP-no, if [Eu/Fe] > +1.…”
Section: Classification Of Cemp-r and Cemp-no Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%