2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The orthogonal meshless finite volume method for solving Euler–Bernoulli beam and thin plate problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SCF is used to compensate the error caused by the assumption of a constant transverse shear stress distribution along the beam thickness. The governing equations of the TBT is obtained in terms of generalized displacements by substituting equation (20) and equation (21) into equation (19),…”
Section: Timoshenko Beam Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCF is used to compensate the error caused by the assumption of a constant transverse shear stress distribution along the beam thickness. The governing equations of the TBT is obtained in terms of generalized displacements by substituting equation (20) and equation (21) into equation (19),…”
Section: Timoshenko Beam Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the primal meshless methods based on the weak forms of governing equations, additional degradation of computational efficiency in terms of computational time and numerical stability is caused by a problematic numerical integration of weak forms [8]. Later, Moosavi and others [9] used the mixed MLPG approach to derive a meshless counterpart of the mixed Finite Volume Method (FVM) [10] for the bending of thin beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, in contrast to FEM, the development of explicit strain gradient C1 models via primal Galerkin meshless methods is straightforward due to a high continuity order of meshless functions [15], but such approaches are also related to reduced accuracy due to the calculation of high-order derivatives of meshless functions [6]. In the mixed meshless approaches, complications may occur due to the improper imposition of boundary conditions [6] and due to solving large unsymmetrical global systems of equations [9]. At present, the focus has been shifted to the development of nodally integrated [16] and smoothed [17] meshless methods that avoid the integration of weak forms of governing equations as much as possible in order to reduce the computation time while obtaining the numerical stability and accuracy of the numerical method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meshless methods are the most promising and have attracted considerable attention for the analysis of engineering problems with intrinsic complexity. Meshless methods are widely used in static and dynamic analyses of the isotropic, laminated composite and functionally graded beam problems [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. However, the studies are very limited regarding to the flexure analysis of laminated composite and sandwich beams by employing a meshless method [24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%