The reactivity of Bunsen's cacodyl disulfide, Me 2 As(S)-S-AsMe 2 , towards nitrogen, phosphorus(III), oxygen and sulfur(II) nucleophiles was evaluated with the aim at identifying its electrophilic atom. The nitrogen nucleophiles either did not react or bind or split the disulfide. All phosphorus(III) nucleophiles desulfurized it. Water, methanol and phenol did not react but thiophenol reacted
IntroductionThe great experimental chemist Robert Bunsen [1] in 1843 prepared a compound Me 4 As 2 S 2 which he named cacodyl disulfide by reducing cacodylic acid, Me 2 AsO 2 H, with hydrogen sulfide. [2] Its structure was not the expected As III /As III bis(dimethylarsenic)disulfide (2) but the As V /As III dimethylarsino dimethyldithioarsinate [3,4 ] and mechanisms of its formation have been proposed. [4,5] Bunsen's cacodyl disulfide (1) is a remarkable chemical chameleon. When dissolved in non-basic solvents it equilibrates with 2 to the extent of approx. 10 %, thus showing an internal redox property. [6] Bunsen, apart from studying the behavior of his disulfide towards heat, HCl, H 2 SO 4 and HNO 3 , he found that it reacted with metal salts of the non-reducible metals Pb II , Sb III and Bi III giving the complexes (Me 2 AsS 2 ) x M (= L x M) [2] and we extended the list by preparing complexes with Zn II , Cd II and Ag I under conditions that afforded pure products. [7] With compounds of lighter metals like AlCl 3 , compound 1 was isomerized to 2, GaCl 3 and InCl 3 bound to 1, while Tl(AcO) 3 was reduced giving LTl. [8] Bunsen himself also found that the reducible Au III and Cu II gave the complexes LAu and LCu [2] and we [7] verified the production of LCu identifying some by-products. Pd II also produced L 2 Pd that was unstable and decomposed to unknown compounds, [9] but Hg II was not reduced. [7] It was proposed [7,8] that the electron for the reduction came from the bound Me 2 AsS 2 group and reasonable