Diagnosis and treatment of thyroid disease are affected by the wide range of thyroid cancer subtypes and their varying degrees of aggressiveness. To better describe the indolent nature of thyroid neoplasms previously classified as noninvasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (NI‐FVPTC), the Endocrine Pathology Society working group has recently coined the term “noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary‐like nuclear features” (NIFTP). The purpose of this nomenclature change is to avoid patients the distress of cancer diagnosis and to decrease the overtreatment of thyroid nodules with a RAS‐LIKE molecular profile similar to follicular adenoma. Consequently, the reclassification has a significant impact on thyroid nodule clinical care as well as histopathologic and cytopathologic diagnosis. This paper will focus on a unique case of Bilateral NIFTP harboring concomitant HRAS and KRAS mutation; we will also review the background, molecular features, and clinical implications of NIFTP as well as the factors behind the nomenclature update. It also seemed helpful to emphasize the impact of NIFTP on clinical practice to avoid overtreating nodules that could be safely managed with lobectomy alone. Actually, despite the diagnosis is postsurgery, a comprehensive preoperative evaluation may raise a suspicion of NIFTP and suggest a more careful plan for treatment. Here, we present a unique case of bilateral NIFTP after total thyroidectomy; subsequent molecular analysis revealed that the patient's right nodule harbored an isolated p.(Q61K) HRAS mutation, while the left a p.(Q61K) KRAS mutation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of this nature. The existence of simultaneous mutations highlights the occurrence of intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) also in the context of FVPTC, which requires comprehensive investigation. The available information shows that NIFTP, identified in accordance with stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, exhibits a very latent clinical behavior even in the face of conservative lobectomy, lacking of radioactive iodine therapy. However, it cannot be regarded as a benign lesion because there is a small but significant incidence of adverse events, such as lymph nodes and distant metastases. Currently, NIFTP can only be suspected before surgery: several efforts could be explored to identify key molecular, cytological, and ultrasonographic traits that may be helpful in raising the possibility of NIFTP in the preoperative context. Additionally, our discovery of simultaneous mutations within the same lesion strengthens the evidence of ITH even in FVPTC. Although the extent and biological impact of this phenomenon in NIFTP are still debated, a deeper understanding is essential to ensure appropriate clinical management.