“…Therefore, VI-MGR is evaluated using several experimental setups to match with the experimental setup of different methods for uniform comparison with their reported results on three publicly available gait datasets: CASIA B gait dataset [44], USF HumanID gait challenge dataset [2] and OU-ISIR treadmill gait dataset B [45]. VI-MGR is compared with the following methods: canonical correlation analysis (CCA) based method [21], joint's position estimation and viewpoint rectification (JPE-VR) based method [18], chrono-gait image (CGI) based method [5], gait energy image (GEI) based method [3], radial integration transform, circular integration transform and weighted Krawtchouk moments (RCK-G) based method [29], gait flow image (GFI) based method [6], method using matrixbased marginal Fisher analysis (MMFA) [13], general tensor discriminant analysis and Gabor features (GTDA-GF) based method [14], dynamics normalisation based gait recognition (DNGR) method [4], spatio-temporal motion characteristics, statistical and physical parameters (STM-SPP) based method [26], spatio-temporal shape and dynamic motion (STS-DM) analysis based method [27] and Gabor wavelet and patch distribution feature (PDF) based method (GPDF) [7].…”