1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90030-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The outcome of trochanteric reattachment in revision total hip arthroplasty with a cable grip system: Mean 6-year follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, a recent series of 223 total hip arthroplasties that used the Dall-Miles cable grip system reported a 91% union rate of the greater trochanter [7]. In this study, the cable grip system was used for all cases, though several different techniques were used to apply the cables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast, a recent series of 223 total hip arthroplasties that used the Dall-Miles cable grip system reported a 91% union rate of the greater trochanter [7]. In this study, the cable grip system was used for all cases, though several different techniques were used to apply the cables.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The nonunion rate in the study described here was 18.7%. In another study, the union rate of greater trochanteric fractures was 91% in 223 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty using the Dall-Miles cable grip system [23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used methods of fixation are using stainless steel cerclage wires or cables [1,[4][5][6]10]. Cerclage wires may compress the bone and soft tissues and can cause vascular interruption, which could affect healing adversely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercial cabling systems are expensive. In addition, wires and cables can break and unravel [5,10]. Complications like proximal migration, early and late fracture of the osteotomy, and nonunion needing reoperation have been described (Table 1) [1,[4][5][6][7]10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation