2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10339-018-0889-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The output monitoring of performed actions: What can we learn from “recall-recognition” performance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some investigators have taken early temporal EEG evidence as support for a heuristic explanation of enactment, such that motor reactivation automatically facilitates item discrimination that precedes later decision processes (Leynes & Bink, 2002). This claim, while speculative, is consistent with an earlier “pop-out” mechanism of enactment proposed by Zimmer et al (2000) where, relative to a verbal task, enactment facilitates faster automatic retrieval of actions such that movements help to make representations more quickly and reliably accessed without active search (see also Li & Wang, 2016; Li et al, 2019; Spranger et al, 2008).…”
Section: Neuroimaging Studies Of Enactmentsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Some investigators have taken early temporal EEG evidence as support for a heuristic explanation of enactment, such that motor reactivation automatically facilitates item discrimination that precedes later decision processes (Leynes & Bink, 2002). This claim, while speculative, is consistent with an earlier “pop-out” mechanism of enactment proposed by Zimmer et al (2000) where, relative to a verbal task, enactment facilitates faster automatic retrieval of actions such that movements help to make representations more quickly and reliably accessed without active search (see also Li & Wang, 2016; Li et al, 2019; Spranger et al, 2008).…”
Section: Neuroimaging Studies Of Enactmentsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Some investigators have taken early temporal EEG evidence as support for a heuristic explanation of enactment, such that motor reactivation automatically facilitates item discrimination that precedes later decision processes (Leynes & Bink, 2002). This claim, while speculative, is consistent with an earlier "pop-out" mechanism of enactment proposed by Zimmer et al (2000) where, relative to a verbal task, enactment facilitates faster automatic retrieval of actions such that movements help to make representations more quickly and reliably accessed without active search (see also Li et al, 2019;Li & Wang, 2016;Spranger et al, 2008).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 94%