The debate regarding the relationship between dissociation and trauma has raised questions regarding the validity of measures of dissociation. Dalenberg et al.'s (2012) meta-analysis included studies using the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES II), but excluded the DES-Comparison (DES-C) scale, claiming that it lacked validity as a measure of dissociation. contended that omitting those studies might have skewed the results. In the current study, we compared the psychometric properties of both measures in two nonclinical US adult (student, general population) samples to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity of the scales. We found support for the DES-II as a measure of dissociation as well as the validity and reliability of the DES-C, which compares well to the DES II. Compared with studies in Dalenberg et al., we found lower correlations between trauma and dissociation. No empirical basis exists to exclude studies using the DES-C in literature reviews. 3 Psychometric Comparison of the Dissociative Experiences Scale II and C: Evaluating The Trauma-Dissociation Link Researchers have long debated the magnitude and meaning of the relation between trauma and dissociative experiences. Carlson et al. (1993) described dissociative experiences as "the lack of integration of thoughts, feelings, and experiences" into consciousness (p. 1030). The classic and widely prevalent trauma theory of dissociation holds that a causal link exists between early life adverse experiences (e.g., childhood sexual and physical abuse) and dissociation (see Janet, 1887, 1889/1973). Nevertheless, in the past few decades researchers have challenged the extent to which trauma causes dissociative symptoms and have identified sociocognitive variables as precursors of dissociative experiences (e.g., suggestions, suggestibility, false memories, fantasy-proneness, and cultural views of dissociative phenomena; see Spanos, 1994; Lilienfeld et al. 1999; Lynn, Lilienfeld, Merckelbach, Giesbrecht, & van der Kloet, 2012). In contrast to the sociocognitive view, Dalenberg et al.'s (2012) meta-analysis and review claimed to demonstrate a strong relationship between trauma and the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES II; Carlson & Putnam, 1993). They excluded all studies that had used an alternative version of the DES, the DES-Comparison (Wright & Loftus, 1999)-a choice that Lynn et al. (2014) challenged. In the current studies, we compare the validity and reliability of the DES II and DES-C in two nonclinical samples, and further examine the relation between trauma and dissociation. Dalenberg et al.'s (2012) meta-analysis included studies that used the DES II, the most widely used measure of dissociative experiences (Condon & Lynn, 2014). The DES II possesses high test-retest reliability (r = .84; Bernstein & Putnam, 1986) and internal consistency (e.g., split half: .93, Pitblado & Sanders, 1991; Cronbach's alpha: .95, Frischholz et al., 1990). The DES II & DES-C 4 DES II also correlates with measures that provide evidence for construct validit...