2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The own-wage elasticity of labor demand: A meta-regression analysis

Abstract: Die Dis cus si on Pape rs die nen einer mög lichst schnel len Ver brei tung von neue ren For schungs arbei ten des ZEW. Die Bei trä ge lie gen in allei ni ger Ver ant wor tung der Auto ren und stel len nicht not wen di ger wei se die Mei nung des ZEW dar.Dis cus si on Papers are inten ded to make results of ZEW research prompt ly avai la ble to other eco no mists in order to encou ra ge dis cus si on and sug gesti ons for revi si ons. The aut hors are sole ly respon si ble for the con tents which do not neces … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
87
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
13
87
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we present changes in aggregate distributional measures in Figure 6 for payroll tax incidence values of 100%, 75%, 50%, 25% and 0% respectively. As labor demand is typically estimated to be more elastic than labor supply (Lichter et al, 2014), an incidence share of more than 50% for employees seems most realistic. Incidence below 100% causes employees to gain less from a payroll tax reduction and hence weakens the positive e ect on work incentives.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we present changes in aggregate distributional measures in Figure 6 for payroll tax incidence values of 100%, 75%, 50%, 25% and 0% respectively. As labor demand is typically estimated to be more elastic than labor supply (Lichter et al, 2014), an incidence share of more than 50% for employees seems most realistic. Incidence below 100% causes employees to gain less from a payroll tax reduction and hence weakens the positive e ect on work incentives.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 3.1 I explain the meta 3 Card and Krueger (1995) and Card et al (2010Card et al ( , 2015 are three examples that look into the field of labor economics. Havránek (2015) examines the literature on intertemporal substitution elasticities and Lichter et al (2015) study labor demand elasticities. Moreover, there is a large body of literature on publication bias (see Rothstein et al (2006) for a review and Brodeur et al (2016) for an application).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lichter et al (2014) show in their meta---analysis that 80 % of the studies estimate labor demand elasticities be---tween 0 and ---1, the average denoting at ---0.51. Especially in the low---wage sector and among low---qualified employees some studies identify elasticities of around ---1 (Arni et al 2014, Sinn et al 2006, Fitzenberger and Franz 1998.…”
Section: Modelling Employment Effects Of the Minimum Wage 43mentioning
confidence: 99%