1999
DOI: 10.2307/1252003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ownership Effect in Consumer Responses to Brand Line Stretches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
326
3
21

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(362 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(22 reference statements)
12
326
3
21
Order By: Relevance
“…These results do not support the literature in which there are usually neutral to negative results for brand attachment after a step-down extension (Kim et al, 2001;Kirmani et al, 1999;Magnoni & Roux, 2012). However, brand attachment may have increased in part, due to parent brands associated with high quality tending to have a positive effect on the evaluation of downscale extensions, improved CBRs and a perceived value for money.…”
Section: Impact Of Downward Extension On Brand Attachmentcontrasting
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results do not support the literature in which there are usually neutral to negative results for brand attachment after a step-down extension (Kim et al, 2001;Kirmani et al, 1999;Magnoni & Roux, 2012). However, brand attachment may have increased in part, due to parent brands associated with high quality tending to have a positive effect on the evaluation of downscale extensions, improved CBRs and a perceived value for money.…”
Section: Impact Of Downward Extension On Brand Attachmentcontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Downward extension strategies have been necessitated by consumer trends, in which buyers have turned away from prestige and luxury brands, to brands that deliver acceptable quality and features, albeit at a low cost (Rahman & Areni, 2014). To ward off these phenomena, firms are offering "lesser" or "mini" versions of their traditional products and brands, meeting the necessities of the value market (Kirmani, Sood & Bridges, 1999). This phenomenon, particularly in the luxury goods sector, is targeted towards a younger market and driven by the perceived potential of a firm's global volume growth post-extension.…”
Section: Downward (Downscale) Extension Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The car market is a high-involvement market, which requires us to consider more than the two brand tiers that are frequently considered in low-involvement markets. In the new car market we distinguish between three brand tiers: prestige brands, volume brands and economy (or price) brands (Edmonson 2003a,b;Kirmani et al 1999;Park et al 1991). Prestige brands, such as Mercedes, BMW and Lexus, are strong brands that are premium priced.…”
Section: Three Different Brand Tiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chaudhuri and Holbrook (2001) developed a scale named "affective Response to Brand ", measuring the degree of positive affect a consumer has towards a brand. The 'Prestige' construct is measured using a scale called 'Prestigiousness' developed by Kirmani, Sood & Bridges (1999). This scale measures how much a person considers some specific object to be high call and exclusive.…”
Section: E Brand Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%