The oxygen isotopic signature of soil‐ and plant‐derived sulphate is controlled by fertilizer type and water source

Novák, Vlastimil; Khatri, Purna Kumar; Laursen, Kristian Holst

doi:10.1111/pce.13877

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 47 publications

(118 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This information is complementary to organ-specific concentrations that provide information on element availability and utilization. This complementary information has been widely used for so-called “traditional isotopes” of, for example, H, C, N, O, and S to investigate for example water and fertilizer utilization, as well as nutrient assimilation ( O’Leary et al, 1992 ; Tcherkez and Tea, 2013 ; Novak et al, 2019 , 2021 ). Analytical advances during the past two decades now also allow the detection of naturally occurring variations of isotope compositions in plants for other, usually heavier elements ( Hoefs, 2018 ), known as “non-traditional isotopes.” Here, we critically review the fractionation of non-traditional stable isotopes to identify biological and physico-chemical processes that control the uptake and transport of these elements within plants (i.e., stable isotope process tracing).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stable Isotope Fractionation of Metals and Metalloids in Plants: A Review

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work critically reviews stable isotope fractionation of essential (B, Mg, K, Ca, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mo), beneficial (Si), and non-essential (Cd, Tl) metals and metalloids in plants. The review (i) provides basic principles and methodologies for non-traditional isotope analyses, (ii) compiles isotope fractionation for uptake and translocation for each element and connects them to physiological processes, and (iii) interlinks knowledge from different elements to identify common and contrasting drivers of isotope fractionation. Different biological and physico-chemical processes drive isotope fractionation in plants. During uptake, Ca and Mg fractionate through root apoplast adsorption, Si through diffusion during membrane passage, Fe and Cu through reduction prior to membrane transport in strategy I plants, and Zn, Cu, and Cd through membrane transport. During translocation and utilization, isotopes fractionate through precipitation into insoluble forms, such as phytoliths (Si) or oxalate (Ca), structural binding to cell walls (Ca), and membrane transport and binding to soluble organic ligands (Zn, Cd). These processes can lead to similar (Cu, Fe) and opposing (Ca vs. Mg, Zn vs. Cd) isotope fractionation patterns of chemically similar elements in plants. Isotope fractionation in plants is influenced by biotic factors, such as phenological stages and plant genetics, as well as abiotic factors. Different nutrient supply induced shifts in isotope fractionation patterns for Mg, Cu, and Zn, suggesting that isotope process tracing can be used as a tool to detect and quantify different uptake pathways in response to abiotic stresses. However, the interpretation of isotope fractionation in plants is challenging because many isotope fractionation factors associated with specific processes are unknown and experiments are often exploratory. To overcome these limitations, fundamental geochemical research should expand the database of isotope fractionation factors and disentangle kinetic and equilibrium fractionation. In addition, plant growth studies should further shift toward hypothesis-driven experiments, for example, by integrating contrasting nutrient supplies, using established model plants, genetic approaches, and by combining isotope analyses with complementary speciation techniques. To fully exploit the potential of isotope process tracing in plants, the interdisciplinary expertise of plant and isotope geochemical scientists is required.

show abstract