2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11430-014-4903-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The P-wave velocity structure of the lithosphere of the North China Craton—Results from the Wendeng-Alxa Left Banner deep seismic sounding profile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our thermal model predicts that the lithosphere is 110-130 km thick only in the southern part of the WB and is on average 100-110 km thick in most of the WB (Figure 4a). In support of our results, regional surface wave tomography (Guo & Chen, 2017;Huang et al, 2009;Y.-C. Tang et al, 2013;X.-C. Wang et al, 2017) and a long-range refraction seismic profile which reach the LAB suggest that most of the WB has a relatively shallow LAB (S.-L. Li, Lai, et al, 2011;S.-J. Wang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our thermal model predicts that the lithosphere is 110-130 km thick only in the southern part of the WB and is on average 100-110 km thick in most of the WB (Figure 4a). In support of our results, regional surface wave tomography (Guo & Chen, 2017;Huang et al, 2009;Y.-C. Tang et al, 2013;X.-C. Wang et al, 2017) and a long-range refraction seismic profile which reach the LAB suggest that most of the WB has a relatively shallow LAB (S.-L. Li, Lai, et al, 2011;S.-J. Wang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Journal Of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While the presence of thin lithosphere in the EB is supported by various seismic studies, detailed information on the LAB (lithosphere‐asthenosphere boundary) depth beneath the NCC is still controversial (Chen et al, 2006; Huang et al, 2009; S.‐J. Wang et al, 2014; Y.‐Y. Zhang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated crustal thicknesses were further interpolated into meshed 0.2° × 0.2° grids of the study area (Figure a). The crustal thickness varies from ∼65 km in the NETP to ∼40 km in the western NCC (Figure ), which is consistent with previous estimates from the H ‐ κ stacking method [e.g., Li et al ., , , ; Pan and Niu , ; Tian and Zhang , ; H. Wang et al ., ; Wang et al ., ; X. Wang et al ., ; W. Wang et al ., ; Xu et al ., ; Zheng et al ., ] and active‐source seismic profiles [e.g., Jia et al ., ; Liu et al ., ; Teng et al ., ; C. Y. Wang et al ., ; S. J. Wang et al ., ]. A difference in the Moho depth is observed from the QLT to Alxa block by as much as 10 km across the HF and NQF (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The profile can be divided into three segments in the landscape, the Alxa block, Jilantai transitional zone, and Lei et al (2015) and Wang et al (2014) and crust1.0, the initial model is established (Table 1). In terms of the above, applying a human-computer interaction method inverts the profile gravity anomaly, and gives the layered structure of the profile density model, which is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Crustal Density Structurementioning
confidence: 99%