1995
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1781(95)02637-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The P50 evoked potential component and mismatch detection in normal volunteers: implications for the study of sensory gating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to prior research, learning effects on the P1 responses were not correlated with learning effects on the other components of neural responses (Boutros & Belger, 1999;Boutros et al, 1995;Kisley, Noecker, & Guinther, 2004). For example, previous studies suggested that statistical learning effects on P1 responses were more detectable in musicians than non-musicians, whereas those on N1 responses did not differ between musicians and nonmusicians (Paraskevopoulos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to prior research, learning effects on the P1 responses were not correlated with learning effects on the other components of neural responses (Boutros & Belger, 1999;Boutros et al, 1995;Kisley, Noecker, & Guinther, 2004). For example, previous studies suggested that statistical learning effects on P1 responses were more detectable in musicians than non-musicians, whereas those on N1 responses did not differ between musicians and nonmusicians (Paraskevopoulos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, the P50 suppression effect (Boutros et al 1995;Clementz et al 1997) is a temporal nonlinearity whereby an auditory evoked component at about 50 msec post-stimulus is modified by the precedence (within about 500 msec) of an identical click stimulus. In …”
Section: Mep@sourcesignalcommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the P50 suppression effect (Boutros et al 1995;Clementz et al 1997) is a temporal nonlinearity whereby an auditory evoked component at about 50 msec post-stimulus is modified by the precedence (within about 500 msec) of an identical click stimulus. In other words, the brain system generating the evoked response is not linearly characterized by the response to a single stimulus: Temporal context affects the evoked response to primary stimulus information.…”
Section: Mep@sourcesignalcommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly, a decrement in amplitude of the second AEP response relative to the first AEP response is found. This response suppression has been referred to as the P50 gating [23] or sensory gating [19]. Sensory gating is believed to be a complex, multifaceted physiological function protecting higher cortical centres from being flooded with incoming irrelevant sensory stimuli [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An often-employed passive, single-stimulus paradigm that studies the effects of stimulus repetition on auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) is the 'double-click' or 'twotone' paradigm [8,[19][20][21][22]. This paradigm involves the presentation of pairs of stimuli in a close (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%