1996
DOI: 10.1093/geront/36.1.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"The PACE Evaluation": Two Responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 20 Branch [ 64 ] suggests that the sites initially studied as part of the federal evaluation of the program may have selected less frail and lighter care patients than intended by the model. Clauser et al [ 65 ] refutes this claim. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 Branch [ 64 ] suggests that the sites initially studied as part of the federal evaluation of the program may have selected less frail and lighter care patients than intended by the model. Clauser et al [ 65 ] refutes this claim. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two articles, the studies suffered from methodological bias 32 and changes in the country’s legislation during the period analyzed, 16 compromising the reliability of the results. Clauser et al 11 (1995) outline final considerations regarding the PACE model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) A single capitated fund or budget, in which all sources of support are pooled‐typically Medicare, Medicaid, and some private pay ‐ensures that the program staff can make and finance care plans, with emphasis on preventive and rehabilitative therapies, in relation to participants' changing needs. (3) As was so clearly true in the original On Lok, there is highly qualified and committed leadership.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…As in any capitation‐funded system, there is the possible risk of selecting enrollees who need lesser amounts of care and, therefore, less costly care, i.e., “skimming.” This question was raised in the 1992 evaluation by Branch et al 2 and contradicted in subsequent letters to the editor, 3, 4 with a response by Branch 5 . In my observations, the PACE programs respond to need for major skilled and supervised long‐term care for very frail individuals, clearly eligible for skilled nursing home care, who may be in hospital awaiting unavailable nursing home beds or at home receiving fragmented and insufficent care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%