The Palaeogeographic and Palaeoclimatic Evolution of Australasia: Palaeo-Productivity Modelling and the Predictive Mapping of Source Rock Environments

Harris, James P.; Crossley, Rob; Ashley, Alexandra; Otto, Simon; Preston, Ros; Watkins, Carl; Watson, John; Goodrich, M.; Valdes, Paul; Allison, Peter A.; Avdis, Alexandros

doi:10.1190/ice2015-2210991

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Both curves increase sharply so that the combined forcing of CO 2 and solar constant is approximately constant over this time period (Foster et al, 2017). The higher CO 2 in the Foster curve relative to the "smooth" curve is because the initial set of simulations showed that the Cambrian simulations were relatively cool compared to data estimates for the period (Henkes et al, 2018).…”

Section: Model Boundary Conditionsmentioning

confidence: 93%

Deep ocean temperatures through time

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Benthic oxygen isotope records are commonly used as a proxy for global mean surface temperatures during the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic, and the resulting estimates have been extensively used in characterizing major trends and transitions in the climate system and for analysing past climate sensitivity. However, some fundamental assumptions governing this proxy have rarely been tested. Two key assumptions are (a) benthic foraminiferal temperatures are geographically well mixed and are linked to surface high-latitude temperatures, and (b) surface high-latitude temperatures are well correlated with global mean temperatures. To investigate the robustness of these assumptions through geological time, we performed a series of 109 climate model simulations using a unique set of paleogeographical reconstructions covering the entire Phanerozoic at the stage level. The simulations have been run for at least 5000 model years to ensure that the deep ocean is in dynamic equilibrium. We find that the correlation between deep ocean temperatures and global mean surface temperatures is good for the Cenozoic, and thus the proxy data are reliable indicators for this time period, albeit with a standard error of 2 K. This uncertainty has not normally been assessed and needs to be combined with other sources of uncertainty when, for instance, estimating climate sensitivity based on using δ18O measurements from benthic foraminifera. The correlation between deep and global mean surface temperature becomes weaker for pre-Cenozoic time periods (when the paleogeography is significantly different from the present day). The reasons for the weaker correlation include variability in the source region of the deep water (varying hemispheres but also varying latitudes of sinking), the depth of ocean overturning (some extreme warm climates have relatively shallow and sluggish circulations weakening the link between the surface and deep ocean), and the extent of polar amplification (e.g. ice albedo feedbacks). Deep ocean sediments prior to the Cretaceous are rare, so extending the benthic foraminifera proxy further into deeper time is problematic, but the model results presented here would suggest that the deep ocean temperatures from such time periods would probably be an unreliable indicator of global mean surface conditions.

show abstract

Section: Model Boundary Conditionsmentioning

confidence: 93%