Pathogenic variants in
BRCA1
and
BRCA2
only explain the underlying genetic cause of about 10% of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Because of cost‐effectiveness, multigene panel testing is often performed even if the clinical utility of testing most of the genes remains questionable. The purpose of our study was to assess the contribution of rare, deleterious‐predicted variants in DNA repair genes in familial breast cancer (BC) in a well‐characterized and homogeneous population. We analyzed 113 DNA repair genes selected from either an exome sequencing or a candidate gene approach in the GENESIS study, which includes familial BC cases with no
BRCA1
or
BRCA2
mutation and having a sister with BC (
N
= 1,207), and general population controls (
N
= 1,199). Sequencing data were filtered for rare loss‐of‐function variants (LoF) and likely deleterious missense variants (MV). We confirmed associations between LoF and MV in
PALB2
,
ATM
and
CHEK2
and BC occurrence. We also identified for the first time associations between
FANCI
,
MAST1
,
POLH
and
RTEL1
and BC susceptibility. Unlike other associated genes, carriers of an
ATM
LoF had a significantly higher risk of developing BC than carriers of an
ATM
MV (OR
LoF
= 17.4
vs.
OR
MV
= 1.6;
p
Het
= 0.002). Hence, our approach allowed us to specify BC relative risks associated with deleterious‐predicted variants in
PALB2
,
ATM
and
CHEK2
and to add
MAST1
,
POLH
,
RTEL1
and
FANCI
to the list of DNA repair genes possibly involved in BC susceptibility. We also highlight that different types of variants within the same gene can lead to different risk estimates.