2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-016-0762-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The PALB2 p.Leu939Trp mutation is not associated with breast cancer risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A first study showed that this variant falls in the PALB2 WD40 domain and results in altered PALB2‐BRCA2 binding . However, it was then demonstrated that it does not disrupt the HR‐mediated DNA repair activity of PALB2 . Two case–control studies conducted in the German population and in the British population on over 800 and 923 familial BC cases, respectively, showed that the c.2816T>G variant was not associated with BC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A first study showed that this variant falls in the PALB2 WD40 domain and results in altered PALB2‐BRCA2 binding . However, it was then demonstrated that it does not disrupt the HR‐mediated DNA repair activity of PALB2 . Two case–control studies conducted in the German population and in the British population on over 800 and 923 familial BC cases, respectively, showed that the c.2816T>G variant was not associated with BC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 However, it was then demonstrated that it does not disrupt the HR-mediated DNA repair activity of PALB2. 52 Two case-control studies conducted in the German population 53 and in the British population 6 on over 800 and 923 familial BC cases, respectively, showed that the c.2816T>G variant was not associated with BC. More recently, a multicenter casecontrol study conducted by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) on 42,671 invasive BC and 42,164 controls did not show any association with this variant (OR c.2816T>G = 1.05; 95%CI 0.83-1.32), 49 leading to the conclusion that the PALB2 c.2816T>G variant should be classified as a likely neutral variant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Park and colleagues reported that the PALB2 :p.Leu939Trp variant might be pathogenic based on the fact that it resulted in altered BRCA2-PALB2 binding, decreased HR capacity, and increased sensitivity to ionizing radiation ( 28 ). However, we provided strong evidences deriving from additional functional studies and very large case-control studies that the PALB2 :p.Leu939Trp is a neutral variant ( 23 ). As a final consideration, it should be noted that of the many missense variants that were functionally proved to prevent the BRCA1-PALB2-BRCA2 complex formation ( 16 , 19 , 24 ), all, with the only exception of the PALB2 :p.Leu939Trp that is consider benign or likely benign, are annotated or should be treated clinically as VUS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Six BRCA2 or PALB2 variants located in the protein interaction domain were included as positive and negative controls. The PALB2 :c.2816T>G (p.Leu939Trp) variant was reported to be not associated with breast cancer risk and to not alter the protein DNA repair activity by HR ( 22 , 23 ). The BRCA2 :c.79A>G (p.Ile27Val) and PALB2 :c.3064AT>GC (p.Met1022Ala) missense variants were functionally tested and resulted not disrupting the BRCA2-PALB2 interaction ( 16 , 24 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L939W is listed as having conflicting interpretations in ClinVar, with a combination of likely benign, benign, and VUS classifications reported from different clinical laboratories. There are previous reports that L939W displays a modest decrease in BRCA2 and RAD51 binding, and affects HR capacity 36 , but others have been unable to reproduce this HR finding 23,25,54 . Given that the original studies of abnormal activity were conducted without validation controls, these results do not qualify as strong PS3 evidence and should be interpreted cautiously in light of substantial refuting evidence.…”
Section: Palb2 Residues V1019 M1022 A1025 I1037 L1046 K1047 L10mentioning
confidence: 89%