2016
DOI: 10.5615/jcunestud.68.2016.0107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Paleography of Anatolian Hieroglyphic Stone Inscriptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Palaeographic criteria strongly suggest a dating after the early 10 th century and before the late 9 th century(Hawkins 2003;d'Alfonso and Payne 2016), while historical information -namely a series of royal names known from local and Assyrian sources of the 9 th century -suggests that these monuments should date no later than the early 9 th century BC. Until further evidence comes to light, we leave open their dating to the period between ca.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palaeographic criteria strongly suggest a dating after the early 10 th century and before the late 9 th century(Hawkins 2003;d'Alfonso and Payne 2016), while historical information -namely a series of royal names known from local and Assyrian sources of the 9 th century -suggests that these monuments should date no later than the early 9 th century BC. Until further evidence comes to light, we leave open their dating to the period between ca.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palaeographic criteria strongly suggest a dating after the early 10 th century and before the late 9 th centuryd'Alfonso and Payne 2016), while historical information -namely a series of royal names known from local and Assyrian sources of the 9 th century -suggests that these monuments should date no later than the early 9 th century BC. Until further evidence comes to light, we leave open their dating to the period between ca.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%