2009
DOI: 10.1190/1.3008053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Paleoproterozoic Kristineberg mining area, northern Sweden: Results from integrated 3D geophysical and geologic modeling, and implications for targeting ore deposits

Abstract: The Kristineberg mining area in the western part of the Paleoproterozoic Skellefte Ore District, northern Sweden, is well known for its base-metal and recent gold discoveries. A pilot 3D geologic model has been constructed on a crustal scale, covering an area of 30ϫ 30 km to depths of 10 km. Constrained 3D inverse and forward gravity modeling have been performed to confirm and refine previous modeling along seismic profiles using mainly 2.5D techniques. The 3D inverse gravity modeling was geared to generating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are several methods for separating the regional field from the gravity data (e.g. Li & Oldenburg 1998b;Nabighian et al 2005;Malehmir et al 2009), we chose a simple second-order polynomial approach to estimate the regional field (Fig. 3d).…”
Section: Potential Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are several methods for separating the regional field from the gravity data (e.g. Li & Oldenburg 1998b;Nabighian et al 2005;Malehmir et al 2009), we chose a simple second-order polynomial approach to estimate the regional field (Fig. 3d).…”
Section: Potential Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second-order polynomial field was also tested but was not optimal as it removed the long wavelength components of the target anomaly. The main Alnö gravity anomaly is successfully separated from the background field after removing the regional trend, this implies that a first-order regional field is suitable for this purpose (Li and Oldenburg, 1998b;Malehmir et al, 2009;Hedin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Regional-residual Removalsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Other suggestions for the basement are 2.0-1.9 Ga granitoids south of the Skellefte district (Billström and Weihed, 1996) and the Bothnian Basin rocks beneath a north-dipping crustal-scale reflector in the Kristineberg area (Malehmir et al, 2007). The structural evolution of the Skellefte District is controlled by a complex fault pattern developed during early crustal extension, later followed by fault inversion (Allen et al, 1996;Bauer et al, 2011) during the main compressional deformation at around 1.87-1.82 Ga (Bilström and Weihed, 1996;Rutland et al, 2001b;Weihed et al, 2002).…”
Section: Geological and Structural Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Viterliden intrusion and the Kristineberg VMS deposit occur in the core of the Kristineberg antiform, where the greatest strains were localised into sub-vertical, curviplanar faults which led to large variations in strain and structural geometry both across and along the regional antiformal structure (Malehmir et al, 2007(Malehmir et al, , 2009Skyttä et al, 2009;Dehghannejad, 2010). Contacts between the different intrusive phases, as well as contacts between the intrusion and the bounding volcanic rocks are generally sheared.…”
Section: The Viterliden Intrusion and The Kristineberg Hanging-wall Rmentioning
confidence: 99%