2017
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.13732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pangenome of the genus Clostridium

Abstract: The pangenome for the genus Clostridium sensu stricto, which was obtained using highly curated and annotated genomes from 16 species is presented; some of these cause disease, while others are used for the production of added-value chemicals. Multilocus sequencing analysis revealed that species of this genus group into at least two clades that include non-pathogenic and pathogenic strains, suggesting that pathogenicity is dispersed across the phylogenetic tree. The core genome of the genus includes 546 protein… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
24
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
6
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the strains listed above (Table 1) to build the E. bugandensis pangenome. Our results support a high genetic diversity and an open pangenome (Figure 1a), features that are often associated with the ability to colonize multiple environments [23]. The E. bugandensis pangenome is composed by 11,682 genes families: 3,167 are common to all strains (core genome); 3,785 are present in more than one (but not all) strains (accessory genome) and; 4,730 are unique to any given strain (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We used the strains listed above (Table 1) to build the E. bugandensis pangenome. Our results support a high genetic diversity and an open pangenome (Figure 1a), features that are often associated with the ability to colonize multiple environments [23]. The E. bugandensis pangenome is composed by 11,682 genes families: 3,167 are common to all strains (core genome); 3,785 are present in more than one (but not all) strains (accessory genome) and; 4,730 are unique to any given strain (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Furthermore, within group I, arguably the authentic Clostridium genus, further taxonomic inconsistencies exist due to the use of BotA for taxonomic classification as a taxonomic marker. This has previously been observed by others (Yutin and Galperin, 2013;Lawson 2016a;Lawson, 2016b;Weigand et al, 2015;Udaondo et al, 2017) but to the best of our knowledge, clostridial taxonomy and evolution has not been revisited using the opportunity offered by next generation sequencing for phylogenomic reclassification until now. Given the pervasiveness of the misclassification in clostridial species, we wonder whether the current system of classification should be kept, or if it should be revisited and simplified using genomic data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…With the development of sequencing technology and other omics technology, more Clostridium from the SFB ecosystem will be sequenced and analyzed. The pangenome and core-genome of Clostridium from the SFB ecosystem can be studied (Udaondo, Duque, & Ramos, 2017). To build the link between genotype and phenotype, genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM) which contains all the metabolic information of a single organism can be reconstructed (Durot, Bourguignon, & Schachter, 2009;Feist, Herrgard, Thiele, Reed, & Palsson, 2009).…”
Section: Systems Biology For the Understanding Of Clostridium In Sfb mentioning
confidence: 99%