1962
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(01)99256-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The paper chromatography of some complexones and their iron chelates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, no data have been reported for this reaction in this class of compounds. However, this mechanism is in accordance to the hypothesis proposed by Hill‐Cottingham17 and agrees with the results obtained in this experiment, in which total soluble iron assessed by AAS decreased as the EDDHA/Fe 3+ solution was left to stand in sunlight. However, no data have been found in the literature that confirm the partial decomposition of this chelating agent.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, no data have been reported for this reaction in this class of compounds. However, this mechanism is in accordance to the hypothesis proposed by Hill‐Cottingham17 and agrees with the results obtained in this experiment, in which total soluble iron assessed by AAS decreased as the EDDHA/Fe 3+ solution was left to stand in sunlight. However, no data have been found in the literature that confirm the partial decomposition of this chelating agent.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It is known that iron chelate solutions were photosensitive and the exposure of the solutions to UV light—in particular direct sunlight—resulted in reduction of the ferric iron and partial decomposition of the organic ligand 17. Moreover, it was observed that the pH of the EDDHA/Fe 3+ solution played an important role in photodegradation 19.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1), labelled as follows: (1) racemic o,o-EDDHA (referring to the (R,R) and (S,S) o,o-EDDHA enantiomers; the enantiomers are mirror images, differing in the direction they deviate polarized light but identical in binding strength), (2) meso o,o-EDDHA (referring to the (R,S) = (S,R) enantiomer; due to the internal mirror plane of the molecule, the (R,S) and (S,R) configurations are identical (Bailey et al 1981;Hill-Cottingham 1962;Ryskievich and Boka 1962)), (3) o,p-EDDHA (referring to the four o,p-EDDHA enantiomers) and (4) rest-EDDHA (referring to the 3 p, p-EDDHA enantiomers and a variety of polycondensates and half-products (Cremonini et al 2001;Hernandez-Apaolaza et al 2006)). In general these four groups are referred to as the different EDDHA isomers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of their high cost, fertilizers containing synthetic Fe(III)-chelates are nowadays commonly used in soilless horticulture as well as in high value, field-grown crops affected by Fe deficiency. Synthetic Fe(III)-chelates used as fertilizers are generally derivatives from the family of ethylenediamine-carboxylic acids and include the Fe(III)-chelates of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) (1), diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) (2), N-(2-hydroxyethyl)ethylenediaminetriacetic acid (HEDTA) (3), ciclohexane-1,2-diaminetetraacetic acid (CDTA) (4), ethylenediamine-N-N=bis(o-hydroxyphenylacetic) acid (o,oEDDHA) (5), ethylenediamine-N-(o-hydroxyphenylacetic)-N=-(p-hydroxyphenylacetic) acid (o,pEDDHA) (6), ethylenediamine-N-N'bis(2-hydroxy-4-methylphenylacetic) acid (EDDHMA) (7), ethylenediamine-N-N=bis(5-carboxy-2-hydroxyphenylacetic) acid (EDDCHA) (8), and ethylenediamine-N-N=bis(2-hydroxy-5-sulfophenylacetic) acid (EDDHSA) (9) [5]. These compounds can be applied either to the root system (via soil or nutrient solution) or to the plant shoots (via foliar spray or trunk injections).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%