Blucher Engineering Proceedings 2021
DOI: 10.5151/siintec2021-208729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"The Paradox and Dynamic Betweem Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance "

Abstract: This article discusses the false antagonism between sustainable development and corporate performance amalgamated with the search for innovation, intensive use of technologies, and global awareness, during the COVID-19 pandemic scenario and the transformations imposed on society, together with the effects of the necessary insertion of new technologies such as Artificial Intelligence. The study highlights the interaction between elements of a technological revolution that imposes profound changes in society, or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the adaptation of a framework that has been developed in a previous study [38], we present a holistic view by integrating the social dimension of sustainability with the economic and ecological dimensions, with climate change and biodiversity being important aspects. Barreto et al [89] argue that the antagonism between sustainable development and corporate performance is questionable. Our framework on home offices supports this view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the adaptation of a framework that has been developed in a previous study [38], we present a holistic view by integrating the social dimension of sustainability with the economic and ecological dimensions, with climate change and biodiversity being important aspects. Barreto et al [89] argue that the antagonism between sustainable development and corporate performance is questionable. Our framework on home offices supports this view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%